CVE-2026-5459
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe User Frontend: AI Powered Frontend Posting, User Directory, Profile, Membership & User Registration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 4.3.1 via the payment_page() function due to missing validation on the 'user_id' user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to activate a free subscription pack for any user on the site, overwriting their existing paid subscription and causing loss of paid features.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe WordPress plugin 'User Frontend' has an IDOR vulnerability in the payment_page() function that lacks validation on the user_id parameter. This allows unauthenticated attackers to submit requests specifying any user ID and activate a free subscription pack for that user, overwriting their existing paid subscription and causing loss of paid features.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm User Frontend plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'User Frontend' or check the file wp-content/plugins/user-frontend/ for existence. Check plugin version in plugin header or readme.txtAffected if Plugin is installed and active
-
Verify payment functionality is exposedLook for the payment_page shortcode or endpoint. Common paths include shortcode usage in pages (e.g., [user_frontend_payment]) or direct URL access to payment-related routes. Check if any page uses the payment shortcode or if the payment_page function is callable via web requestAffected if The payment_page function or payment shortcode is publicly accessible
-
Confirm subscription feature is enabledCheck WordPress plugin settings for User Frontend. Look for subscription/payment configuration options in the plugin admin panel. Verify that any subscription pack or payment feature has been created and is activeAffected if Subscription or payment features are configured and active in the plugin settings
-
Check for missing user_id authorizationInspect the payment_page() function code in the plugin file (typically user-frontend/wpuf-functions.php or similar). Look for code that handles the user_id parameter without verifying the current user owns that ID. Search for code like $_GET['user_id'] or $_POST['user_id'] being used directly without current_user_can() or ownership validationAffected if The user_id parameter is processed without proper authorization checks validating user ownership
If the User Frontend plugin is installed with subscription/payment features enabled and the payment_page function is publicly accessible without user ownership validation, the environment is affected by this IDOR vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to a patched version of the plugin when available. Until then, restrict access to the payment_page() function or implement proper authorization checks validating that the current user owns the specified user_id before processing subscription changes.
Latest version available in the WordPress plugin repository (newer than 4.3.1)
- Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Find 'User Frontend: AI Powered Frontend Posting, User Directory, Profile, Membership & User Registration'
- If an update is available, click 'Update Now'
- After updating, verify the payment_page() function has proper user_id validation by checking plugin changelog or release notes
- Consider reviewing user subscription status in the membership/payments settings to ensure no unauthorized changes occurred
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5459 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5459 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data