Improper Privilege ManagementWeakness · CWE-269

CVE-2026-54652

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-08
Patch available
A vendor patch is available. No clean upgrade release — apply the published patch.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click Patch available 6 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Frigate is an open source network video recorder. In version 0.17.1, the GET /api/logs/{service} endpoint allows any authenticated user including the viewer role to download Frigate and nginx logs, exposing auto-generated admin passwords and camera credentials logged in request query strings and enabling viewer-to-admin privilege escalation. A fixed release has not been identified.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The GET /api/logs/{service} endpoint in Frigate 0.17.1 lacks proper role-based authorization, allowing any authenticated user including those with the viewer role to download system logs. This exposes sensitive credentials including auto-generated admin passwords and camera authentication details logged in query strings, enabling privilege escalation from viewer to admin.

MitigationSince no patched version is available, restrict network access to the Frigate API, implement additional authentication gateway or Web Application Firewall in front of the service, and audit logs for unauthorized access to the /api/logs endpoint until an official fix is released.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Frigate version
    Check the installed Frigate version (typically via docker image tag, UI footer, or config file)
    Affected if Running version 0.17.1 or any version in the 0.17.x line prior to any available patch
  2. Verify API endpoint accessibility
    Confirm the Frigate API is network-accessible (check firewall rules, reverse proxy config, or service binding)
    Affected if The /api/logs/{service} endpoint is reachable from untrusted networks or by non-admin users
  3. Review user role configuration
    Inspect Frigate's authentication configuration to determine if viewer roles are configured and enabled
    Affected if Viewer role accounts exist and are permitted to authenticate to the API
  4. Test endpoint authorization
    Attempt to access GET /api/logs/{service} using a viewer-level account (or inspect API access control configuration)
    Affected if Viewer role can retrieve log data from the endpoint without admin privileges
  5. Audit logs for credential exposure
    Examine stored or live Frigate logs for sensitive strings such as passwords, API keys, or authentication tokens in query parameters
    Affected if Logs contain plaintext credentials, auto-generated admin passwords, or camera authentication details

You are affected if running Frigate 0.17.x with the API accessible to viewer-role users who can retrieve system logs containing sensitive credentials.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Patch available Apply the vendor patch
Vendor patch github.com →
Interim mitigation

Since no patched version is available, restrict network access to the Frigate API, implement additional authentication gateway or Web Application Firewall in front of the service, and audit logs for unauthorized access to the /api/logs endpoint until an official fix is released.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the patch applied

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-54652 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-54652 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data