CVE-2026-54808
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in WP Travel WP Travel Gutenberg Blocks allows Blind SQL Injection. This issue affects WP Travel Gutenberg Blocks: from n/a through 3.9.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL Injection vulnerability in the WP Travel Gutenberg Blocks WordPress plugin allows attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via unsanitized input. The blind SQL injection variant means attackers can extract data indirectly by observing application behavior differences. The vulnerability affects all versions through 3.9.4.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify WP Travel Gutenberg Blocks is installedAccess WordPress admin dashboard, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins, and search for 'WP Travel Gutenberg Blocks' or check the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for the plugin folderAffected if The plugin is not found in the installed plugins list
-
Check installed plugin versionIn WordPress admin > Plugins > Installed Plugins, click on the plugin name to view details, or inspect the main plugin file (e.g., wp-travel-gutenberg-blocks.php) for the 'Version' header commentAffected if Unable to determine version or version cannot be read
-
Compare version to affected rangeCompare the installed version number to the affected range (versions through 3.9.4). Any version 3.9.4 or lower is within the affected rangeAffected if Installed version is 3.9.4 or lower
-
Confirm plugin is activeIn WordPress admin > Plugins > Installed Plugins, verify the plugin status shows 'Active' under the plugin nameAffected if Plugin is installed but not active (inactive plugins still present code but are not executable)
-
Identify vulnerable input parametersReview server access logs for unusual SQL syntax in URL parameters, particularly in requests targeting plugin endpoints. Common SQL injection indicators include: UNION SELECT, OR 1=1, quotes followed by SQL keywords, or unexpected parentheses in query stringsAffected if Suspicious SQL-like patterns found in logs targeting plugin-related URLs
The environment is affected if the WP Travel Gutenberg Blocks plugin is installed, active, and running version 3.9.4 or lower.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to the patched version of WP Travel Gutenberg Blocks when released. Until then, consider disabling the plugin or deploying a WAF rule to block SQL injection attempts.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-54808 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-54808 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data