CVE-2026-54906
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedconcurrent-ruby is a modern concurrency tools for Ruby. Prior to 1.3.7, Concurrent::ReadWriteLock#release_write_lock does not verify that the calling thread acquired the write lock. Any thread with access to the lock object can release an active write lock held by another thread. A second writer can then enter its critical section while the first writer is still running. Concurrent::ReadWriteLock#release_read_lock also decrements the shared counter even when no read lock is held. Calling it on a fresh lock changes the counter from 0 to -1, after which normal read acquisition raises Concurrent::ResourceLimitError. This is a synchronization correctness issue in the public Concurrent::ReadWriteLock API. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.3.7.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe concurrent-ruby gem versions prior to 1.3.7 have two synchronization bugs in Concurrent::ReadWriteLock. First, release_write_lock lacks thread ownership verification, allowing any thread to release a write lock held by another thread, permitting a second writer into the critical section. Second, release_read_lock decrements the shared counter even when no read lock is held, corrupting state from 0 to -1 and causing Concurrent::ResourceLimitError on subsequent read acquisition attempts.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.3.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed concurrent-ruby versionRun 'gem list concurrent-ruby' or inspect the version in your Gemfile.lock under the concurrent-ruby entryAffected if The version listed is below 1.3.7 (e.g., 1.3.6, 1.3.0, etc.)
-
Search for Concurrent::ReadWriteLock usageSearch your codebase for references to 'Concurrent::ReadWriteLock' using grep or your IDE's search (e.g., grep -r 'Concurrent::ReadWriteLock' .)Affected if Your code instantiates or uses Concurrent::ReadWriteLock objects
-
Check for release_write_lock callsSearch your codebase for method calls to 'release_write_lock' (e.g., grep -r 'release_write_lock' .)Affected if Your code calls release_write_lock on ReadWriteLock instances
-
Check for release_read_lock callsSearch your codebase for method calls to 'release_read_lock' (e.g., grep -r 'release_read_lock' .)Affected if Your code calls release_read_lock on ReadWriteLock instances
You are affected if you have concurrent-ruby version below 1.3.7 AND your codebase uses Concurrent::ReadWriteLock with release_write_lock or release_read_lock methods called from multiple threads.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.3.7
Upgrade concurrent-ruby to version 1.3.7 or later to obtain the fixed implementation that properly validates thread ownership and lock state.
concurrent-ruby version 1.3.7
- Check current version by running: gem list concurrent-ruby
- Update Gemfile to specify: gem 'concurrent-ruby', '~> 1.3.7'
- Run: bundle update concurrent-ruby
- Alternatively, update directly: gem install concurrent-ruby -v 1.3.7
- Verify the fix by running: ruby -e "require 'concurrent'; puts Concurrent::VERSION" to confirm version 1.3.7 or later is installed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,840.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-54906 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-54906 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data