ProteusApplication · Labcenter

CVE-2026-5495

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2026-04-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Labcenter Electronics Proteus PDSPRJ File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Labcenter Electronics Proteus. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of PDSPRJ files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-25720.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Labcenter Electronics Proteus contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in its PDSPRJ file parser. The flaw results from insufficient validation of user-supplied data during file parsing, allowing a write operation to extend past the end of an allocated memory buffer. Attackers can exploit this by tricking users into opening malicious PDSPRJ files, achieving arbitrary code execution in the context of the current process.

MitigationAvoid opening PDSPRJ files from untrusted or unknown sources. Apply vendor patches when available and monitor Labcenter Electronics for security updates.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ProteusApplication
Affected:= 8.17

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Labcenter Proteus installation
    Check for Labcenter Proteus installation by searching common installation directories (typically C:\Program Files\Labcenter Electronics\Proteus X) or inspecting installed programs in system settings
    Affected if Labcenter Proteus is present on the system
  2. Identify installed Proteus version
    Locate the Proteus executable (often PDS.exe or similar) and check its version properties, or view the version in Add/Remove Programs
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 8.17
  3. Confirm PDSPRJ file handling capability
    Verify that the Proteus installation includes PDSPRJ file association or file parsing capabilities by checking for .pdsprj file type handlers in the system or within the application's file open dialogs
    Affected if PDSPRJ files can be opened or parsed by the installed Proteus application
  4. Review PDSPRJ file interaction patterns
    Examine recent file access logs, browser download history, or email attachments to determine if PDSPRJ files from untrusted or unknown sources have been opened recently
    Affected if PDSPRJ files from untrusted or unknown sources have been opened or are likely to be opened

User is affected if Labcenter Proteus version 8.17 is installed AND the system handles PDSPRJ files that could originate from untrusted sources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Avoid opening PDSPRJ files from untrusted or unknown sources. Apply vendor patches when available and monitor Labcenter Electronics for security updates.

Fix this in Proteus Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,880
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5495 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5495 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data