CVE-2026-55455
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAppsmith is a platform to build admin panels, internal tools, and dashboards. Prior to 2.1, the outbound HTTP host filter applied by WebClientUtils (used by the REST API and GraphQL datasource plugins) validates hosts against an exact-match string denylist. The comprehensive address-class check (loopback, any-local, link-local, fc00::/7) exists only on a separate code path used by SMTP, not by the HTTP plugin path. As a result, an authenticated user can craft outbound requests that reach loopback-bound services inside the container. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAppsmith's WebClientUtils applies an insufficient host filter to outbound HTTP requests from REST API and GraphQL datasource plugins. The HTTP plugin path uses only an exact-match string denylist instead of comprehensive address-class validation (loopback, link-local, fc00::/7) that exists in the separate SMTP code path. This allows authenticated users to craft requests reaching internal loopback-bound services within the container.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Appsmith versionCheck the version.yaml file in the Appsmith installation directory, or look at the footer of the Appsmith UI which displays the running version number.Affected if The displayed version is less than 2.1 (e.g., 2.0.x, 1.x.x)
-
Locate WebClientUtils implementationInspect the source code or JAR files for the class 'WebClientUtils' in the backend installation. Search for methods handling outbound HTTP requests from datasource plugins.Affected if The code uses an exact-match string denylist for host filtering rather than address-class validation (checking for loopback 127.0.0.0/8, link-local 169.254.0.0/16, IPv6 fc00::/7)
-
Check REST API datasource configurationNavigate to the Admin Settings > Datasources section in the Appsmith UI, or inspect the database table for datasources. Look for any REST API datasources created by users.Affected if Any REST API datasources exist and the WebClientUtils uses denylist-only filtering (exact string matches)
-
Check GraphQL datasource configurationNavigate to Admin Settings > Datasources in the Appsmith UI, or query the datasource database table. Look for any GraphQL datasources.Affected if Any GraphQL datasources exist and the WebClientUtils lacks comprehensive address-class validation
-
Verify SMTP path host validation existsLocate the SMTP-related code path in WebClientUtils and confirm it implements proper address-class validation (loopback, link-local, IPv6 private ranges). Compare this to the HTTP plugin path.Affected if SMTP path validates address classes but HTTP/REST/GraphQL paths use only string denylists
You are affected if running Appsmith version < 2.1 with REST API or GraphQL datasources configured, and the WebClientUtils lacks comprehensive address-class validation for outbound HTTP requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.1
Upgrade to Appsmith version 2.1 or later, which implements comprehensive address-class validation for outbound HTTP requests to prevent SSRF attacks against internal services.
Appsmith 2.1
- Upgrade Appsmith to version 2.1 or later to obtain the fixed WebClientUtils with comprehensive address-class validation (loopback, any-local, link-local, fc00::/7)
- After upgrade, verify the REST API and GraphQL datasource plugins now use the protected code path with proper host filtering
- Confirm that outbound HTTP requests are now validated against address classes rather than just an exact-match denylist
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-55455 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-55455 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data