CVE-2026-55488
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedmotionEye (mEye) is an online interface for a piece of software called "motion," which is a video surveillance program with motion detection. Versions prior to 0.44.0 contain an absolute path traversal vulnerability in multiple media file handlers that allows an attacker to read arbitrary files from the filesystem. The affected handlers accept a user-controlled filename parameter and construct filesystem paths using `os.path.join()`. When an absolute path is supplied, Python discards the configured media directory and returns the attacker-supplied path directly. The application then bypasses Tornado's built-in path validation by overriding the relevant safety checks. As a result, an attacker can access files outside of the configured camera media directory, subject to the permissions of the motionEye process. Version 0.44.0 fixes the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencemotionEye versions before 0.44.0 contain an absolute path traversal vulnerability in media file handlers where user-supplied filename parameters are passed to os.path.join(). When an absolute path is provided, Python's os.path.join() returns only the absolute path, bypassing the configured media directory. The application intentionally overrides Tornado's built-in path validation safety checks, allowing attackers to read arbitrary files from the filesystem subject to process permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed motionEye versionCheck the version of motionEye installed on your system. Common methods include: running 'pip show motioneye' if installed via pip, checking the package manager output, or inspecting the motioneye version file if present in the installation directory.Affected if The installed version is lower than 0.44.0 (for example, 0.43.1, 0.42.0, etc.)
-
Verify motionEye web service is runningConfirm that the motionEye web interface is active and accessible. This typically runs on a specific port (commonly 8761). Check if the service is listening on its configured port.Affected if The web service is running and accessible - the path traversal vulnerability only affects the media file handler functionality exposed through the web interface.
-
Identify media file handler configurationInspect the motionEye configuration to determine if media file serving is enabled. This is typically controlled via the 'media_file_name' or similar configuration parameters that handle file paths for stored media.Affected if Media file handling is configured and the web interface accepts filename parameters - the vulnerability occurs when user-supplied filename parameters are passed to os.path.join() in the media file handlers.
You are affected if motionEye version is below 0.44.0 AND the web interface with media file handling is accessible, since the absolute path traversal allows bypassing the configured media directory to read arbitrary files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade motionEye to version 0.44.0 or later to remediate this path traversal vulnerability.
0.44.0
- Identify your current motionEye installation method (e.g., pip, Docker, or system package)
- Stop the motionEye service
- Backup your current configuration and data
- Upgrade to version 0.44.0 using your package manager (e.g., pip install motioneye==0.44.0, docker pull, or system package manager)
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version
- Restart the motionEye service
- Test that the application functions normally
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-55488 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-55488 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data