Code InjectionWeakness · CWE-94

CVE-2026-55771

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click 5 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
CedarJava is an open source Java implementation of the Cedar policy language, used for fine-grained authorization decisions. In versions prior to 4.9.0, the EntityIdentifier.equals() has inverted null/self branches which could lead to incorrect equality comparisons. The EntityIdentifier.equals() method has inverted logic for null and self-reference checks, returning true for null comparisons and false for self-comparisons. This does not affect Cedar authorization decisions (computed in Rust from JSON), but could affect integrators who perform their own equality checks on entity identifiers. This issue has been fixed in version 4.9.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

CedarJava versions prior to 4.9.0 contain a bug in EntityIdentifier.equals() where the null and self-reference checks are inverted - the method incorrectly returns true when comparing against null and false when comparing an object to itself. This affects custom equality checks performed by integrators using the Java API but does not impact core Cedar authorization decisions computed in Rust.

MitigationUpgrade CedarJava to version 4.9.0 or later to obtain the fixed EntityIdentifier.equals() implementation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify CedarJava dependency
    Check your project's dependency management (Maven pom.xml, Gradle build.gradle, or similar) for a dependency on CedarJava/cedar-java and note its version
    Affected if The version is present and is below 4.9.0
  2. Locate EntityIdentifier usage
    Search your codebase for imports of EntityIdentifier (e.g., import com.cedarpolicy.model.EntityIdentifier) and usages of the .equals() method on EntityIdentifier objects
    Affected if Your code performs .equals() calls on EntityIdentifier objects for custom equality checks
  3. Test equals behavior with null
    In a test environment, create an EntityIdentifier instance and call entityIdentifier.equals(null) - observe if it incorrectly returns true
    Affected if equals(null) returns true (should return false)
  4. Test equals behavior with self
    In a test environment, create an EntityIdentifier instance and compare it to itself using entityIdentifier.equals(entityIdentifier) - observe if it incorrectly returns false
    Affected if equals(self) returns false (should return true)

You are affected if your project uses CedarJava prior to version 4.9.0 and performs custom EntityIdentifier.equals() comparisons in your code.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade CedarJava to version 4.9.0 or later to obtain the fixed EntityIdentifier.equals() implementation.

Recommended fix High confidence

4.9.0

  1. Locate the CedarJava dependency in your project's build configuration (pom.xml for Maven or build.gradle for Gradle)
  2. Update the CedarJava dependency version to 4.9.0
  3. Run your build tool to download the new version (mvn clean install for Maven or ./gradlew build for Gradle)
  4. Rebuild your project to ensure compatibility with the updated library
  5. Test any code that performs equality checks on EntityIdentifier objects to verify correct behavior after the fix

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,210
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-55771 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-55771 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data