CVE-2026-5586
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was determined in zhongyu09 openchatbi up to 0.2.1. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component Multi-stage Text2SQL Workflow. Executing a manipulation of the argument keywords can lead to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA SQL injection vulnerability exists in the openchatbi application (versions up to 0.2.1) within the Multi-stage Text2SQL Workflow component. The vulnerability is caused by improper sanitization of the 'keywords' argument, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious SQL statements through this parameter.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify openchatbi installation and versionLocate the openchatbi installation directory and check the version file (such as version.py, package.json, or VERSION file) to determine the installed version numberAffected if The installed version is 0.2.1 or any earlier version (up to and including 0.2.1)
-
Confirm Multi-stage Text2SQL Workflow is in useInspect the openchatbi configuration files or workflow definitions to determine if the Multi-stage Text2SQL Workflow component is enabled or actively usedAffected if The Multi-stage Text2SQL Workflow component is enabled or configured in the environment
-
Verify keywords parameter exposureReview the API endpoints, request handlers, or workflow input definitions that accept the 'keywords' argument in the Text2SQL workflow implementationAffected if The 'keywords' parameter is accepted as user input without being blocked or restricted at the API layer
-
Inspect database query construction for keywords handlingExamine the source code handling the 'keywords' argument in the Text2SQL workflow to see how it is incorporated into database queriesAffected if The 'keywords' value is concatenated directly into SQL queries or otherwise passed to the database without parameterized binding or ORM protection
The environment is affected if openchatbi version 0.2.1 or earlier is installed, the Multi-stage Text2SQL Workflow is enabled, and the 'keywords' parameter flows directly into SQL queries without parameterized binding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version if available; otherwise, implement parameterized queries or prepared statements and add robust input validation on the 'keywords' parameter to prevent SQL injection.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5586 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5586 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data