CVE-2026-55879
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpenReplay is a self-hosted session replay suite. From 1.24.0 before 1.25.0, the OpenReplay tracking SDK accepts custom event names and captured page URLs from any visitor using a public project key, stores them in ClickHouse without output encoding, and later renders them in the authenticated dashboard through TextEllipsis and the event-details modal, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to store script that executes in the dashboard origin, reads the session JWT from localStorage, and takes over a dashboard account. This issue is fixed in version 1.25.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored XSS vulnerability in OpenReplay's tracking SDK (versions 1.24.0 before 1.25.0) allows unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious JavaScript via custom event names or page URLs using a public project key. The unsanitized input is stored in ClickHouse and executed when viewed in the authenticated dashboard, enabling attackers to steal session JWTs from localStorage and hijack dashboard accounts.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify OpenReplay installation and versionCheck your OpenReplay deployment for the installed version. If using Docker, run 'docker ps' and inspect the container image tags, or check package.json/package-lock.json if self-building the tracking SDK. If using the hosted service, contact your OpenReplay administrator to confirm the version.Affected if The installed version is 1.24.0 or any version before 1.25.0.
-
Confirm tracking SDK is in useInspect your web application source code for the OpenReplay tracking snippet. Look for a script tag loading from your OpenReplay instance that initializes the tracker, typically containing 'init({ projectKey: ... })'.Affected if The OpenReplay JavaScript tracker is deployed on any frontend application.
-
Verify public project key configurationLocate the projectKey value passed to the OpenReplay init() function in your tracking snippet. This is the public key that can be used to send data without authentication.Affected if A valid public project key is configured and accessible in client-side code.
-
Confirm ClickHouse storage backendCheck your OpenReplay backend configuration for the storage settings. In the docker-compose.yml or environment variables, look for ClickHouse connection details (typically port 8123) or the OR_STORAGE_CLICKHOUSE environment variable.Affected if ClickHouse is configured as the session storage backend (the default configuration).
Your environment is affected if OpenReplay version 1.24.0 or earlier is deployed with the JavaScript tracking SDK and ClickHouse storage, since an attacker with a public project key can inject malicious scripts that execute in the dashboard.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to OpenReplay version 1.25.0 or later to implement proper input sanitization and output encoding. As a temporary mitigation, consider restricting or rotating public project keys to limit attack surface.
1.25.0
- Upgrade OpenReplay to version 1.25.0 or later
- Consult the official OpenReplay upgrade documentation for your deployment method (Docker, Kubernetes, etc.)
- After upgrading, verify the dashboard loads correctly and session replay functionality works as expected
- Ensure all dashboard users re-authenticate after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-55879 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-55879 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data