CVE-2026-55955
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Authentication vulnerability in Apache Tomcat allowed a replay attack against the EncryptionInterceptor in the cluster component. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.22, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.55, from 9.0.13 through 9.0.18, from 8.5.38 through 8.5.100, from 7.0.100 through 7.0.109. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.23, 10.1.56, 9.0.119, which fixes the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceImproper authentication in Apache Tomcat's cluster EncryptionInterceptor allows attackers to capture and replay encrypted session data, potentially gaining unauthorized access by retransmitting previously valid encrypted messages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.0.119>= 10.1.0, < 10.1.56>= 11.0.0, < 11.0.23CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Tomcat installation and versionLocate the Tomcat installation directory and check the version. Common locations include /opt/tomcat, /usr/share/tomcat, or C:\Program Files\Apache\Tomcat. In the installation directory, check the RELEASE-NOTES file or run: java -cp [catalina.jar] org.apache.catalina.util.ServerInfoAffected if The installed version is < 9.0.119, or >= 10.1.0 and < 10.1.56, or >= 11.0.0 and < 11.0.23
-
Verify clustering is enabledCheck the server.xml configuration file (typically in the conf/ directory) for a <Cluster> element. This indicates Tomcat clustering is configured.Affected if A <Cluster> element exists in server.xml, enabling cluster communication between Tomcat instances
-
Confirm EncryptionInterceptor is in useWithin the <Cluster> element in server.xml, search for the element <Interceptor className="org.apache.catalina.tribes.transport.ReplicationInterceptor"> or similar encryption-related interceptor configuration. Also check for any custom interceptor configuration that handles encrypted message transmission.Affected if The cluster configuration includes an EncryptionInterceptor or similar encryption mechanism for inter-node communication
-
Check for session replication configurationExamine the context.xml or server.xml for <Manager pathname="" /> or <Distributable/> tag in web.xml, which enables session replication across cluster nodes.Affected if Session replication is enabled, meaning encrypted session data would be transmitted between cluster nodes and could be vulnerable to replay
A user is affected if they run a vulnerable Tomcat version with clustering enabled that uses EncryptionInterceptor for session replication, as this allows replay of captured encrypted session messages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.0.11910.1.5611.0.23
Upgrade Apache Tomcat to version 11.0.23, 10.1.56, or 9.0.119 (or later) to patch the replay attack vulnerability in the EncryptionInterceptor.
Tomcat 9.0.119 (or 10.1.56 or 11.0.23 depending on your current major version)
- 1. Identify the current Apache Tomcat version installed in your environment
- 2. For Tomcat 9.0.x: Upgrade to version 9.0.119 or later
- 3. For Tomcat 10.1.x: Upgrade to version 10.1.56 or later
- 4. For Tomcat 11.0.x: Upgrade to version 11.0.23 or later
- 5. Download the new version from the official Apache Tomcat repository (https://tomcat.apache.org/)
- 6. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first
- 7. Deploy the upgraded version to production
- 8. If using Tomcat's clustering with EncryptionInterceptor, verify the replay attack vulnerability is mitigated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-55955 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-55955 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data