CWE-312Weakness · CWE-312

CVE-2026-55997

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-08-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
90/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Zero-click 2 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Rancher issues long-lived registration tokens to authenticate nodes and agents joining a downstream cluster. These tokens were stored and exposed in plaintext with no expiration, so a malicious user could obtain one either through the Rancher API, etcd, stored automation, or direct file access on a node, and could use it at any time to register a rogue node into the cluster.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Rancher stores long-lived node/agent registration tokens in plaintext with no expiration. Attackers with access to the Rancher API, etcd, stored automation, or node file systems can retrieve these tokens and use them at any time to register unauthorized (rogue) nodes into downstream clusters.

MitigationImplement token expiration/rotation and encrypt tokens at rest. Audit and revoke existing plaintext tokens, then enforce time-limited tokens with automatic rotation for all future node registrations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Rancher version
    Run 'rancher --version' or check the Rancher UI under 'Support' page to determine the installed version. Compare against the affected version range for this CVE.
    Affected if Installed version falls within the affected version range and has node/agent registration tokens configured.
  2. List active node registration tokens
    Use Rancher API or UI to query /v3/clusterregistrationtokens or navigate to cluster settings to view all node registration tokens. Note their creation dates and status.
    Affected if Long-lived tokens exist without expiration dates, especially those created before token expiration policies were implemented.
  3. Verify token expiration settings
    Inspect each node registration token's properties via Rancher API: GET /v3/clusterregistrationtokens/{id} - check for 'ttl' (time-to-live) or 'expiresAt' fields.
    Affected if Tokens show no ttl value, null expiresAt, or expiration dates far in the future (years).
  4. Examine etcd for plaintext tokens
    If you have etcd access, run 'etcdctl get /rancher/clusterRegistrationTokens/' or similar prefix searches to enumerate stored token data. Check token values stored in etcd.
    Affected if Tokens are stored in plaintext without encryption in etcd.
  5. Check cluster automation and node files
    Review Rancher-backed cluster provisioning automation, node driver configs, and any stored scripts for embedded token values. Look in Rancher project secrets or configmaps.
    Affected if Registration tokens appear in plaintext within configuration files, automation scripts, or persistent storage.

A user is affected if their Rancher installation contains node/agent registration tokens stored in plaintext with no expiration or with expiration set far in the future, especially if accessed via etcd, API, or stored automation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement token expiration/rotation and encrypt tokens at rest. Audit and revoke existing plaintext tokens, then enforce time-limited tokens with automatic rotation for all future node registrations.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation12.0 h
  • Implementation80.0 h
  • Testing24.0 h
  • Review / QA16.0 h
132.0 hours of engineering $23,280
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $37,248.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-55997 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-55997 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data