CVE-2026-56024
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Saad Iqbal WP EasyPay allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WP EasyPay: from n/a through 4.5.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WP EasyPay WordPress plugin (versions up to 4.5.0) allows attackers to trick authenticated users into executing unintended administrative actions by crafting malicious requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm WP EasyPay plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'WP EasyPay' or 'EasyPay' in the list. Note whether it is active or inactive.Affected if Plugin is installed and active
-
Check installed plugin versionIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins, find WP EasyPay, and view the version number displayed below the plugin name. Compare to 4.5.0.Affected if Version is 4.5.0 or lower
-
Inspect forms for nonce validationUsing a file manager or FTP, navigate to wp-content/plugins/ and locate the wp-easypay or similar folder. Examine PHP files containing form definitions (typically files with 'form', 'admin', or 'settings' in the name). Look for the presence of wp_nonce_field() or wp_nonce_url() function calls inside <form> tags.Affected if Forms lack nonce field generation (wp_nonce_field) in state-changing forms
-
Inspect AJAX handlers for nonce verificationIn the plugin directory, locate PHP files handling AJAX requests (search for add_action('wp_ajax_'). Open these files and verify that each handler includes a nonce verification call such as wp_verify_nonce() or check_ajax_referer() before processing the request.Affected if AJAX handlers do not verify nonce tokens before executing state-changing operations
User is affected if WP EasyPay plugin is installed with version 4.5.0 or lower and contains forms or AJAX actions that lack nonce validation for CSRF protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (nonce validation) on all state-changing forms and AJAX actions within the plugin, and verify the referer header or origin header on POST requests.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-56024 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-56024 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data