CWE-345Weakness · CWE-345

CVE-2026-56073

CRITICAL · 9.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cap-go before 12.128.2 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in OTP verification that allows attackers to bypass email verification by modifying server responses. Attackers can intercept OTP verification requests and manipulate HTTP responses to falsely mark verification successful, enabling unauthorized 2FA enablement and account takeover.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cap-go before 12.128.2 has a critical authentication bypass in its OTP verification flow where the server trusts client-manipulated HTTP responses. Attackers can intercept verification requests and modify the server response to falsely indicate successful verification, bypassing email/2FA verification entirely and enabling account takeover.

MitigationUpdate to version 12.128.2 or later. Ensure OTP verification logic performs server-side validation that cannot be overridden by client-side response manipulation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Cap-go installed version
    Locate the Cap-go package in your environment and retrieve its version number. This may be in package.json, a lock file, or the installed node_modules. Compare the version against the fixed release 12.128.2.
    Affected if The installed version is earlier than 12.128.2
  2. Verify OTP verification is in use
    Inspect your application configuration or codebase to determine whether the OTP/email verification feature provided by Cap-go is enabled for user authentication flows.
    Affected if OTP verification is enabled and the Cap-go version is vulnerable
  3. Inspect OTP verification endpoint logic
    Examine the server-side code handling OTP verification requests. Look for the validation routine that checks whether an entered OTP code is valid. Determine if this validation relies on a response that could be intercepted and modified by a client.
    Affected if The verification logic accepts client-controlled responses without independent server-side validation of the OTP correctness
  4. Test OTP flow for response manipulation
    During an OTP verification request, intercept the HTTP response from your server using a proxy tool. Modify the response body to indicate verification success (for example, changing a 'verified': false to 'verified': true or a similar success flag), then forward the modified response. Observe whether the application treats this manipulated response as a successful verification.
    Affected if The application accepts the manipulated response and grants access as if the OTP was verified

You are affected if Cap-go version is below 12.128.2 AND the OTP verification feature is enabled in your environment.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update to version 12.128.2 or later. Ensure OTP verification logic performs server-side validation that cannot be overridden by client-side response manipulation.

Recommended fix High confidence

12.128.2 or later

  1. Upgrade Cap-go to version 12.128.2 or later to resolve the OTP verification bypass vulnerability
  2. After upgrading, verify that the OTP/email verification flow now properly validates server-side responses and cannot be manipulated via HTTP response modification
  3. Test that legitimate OTP verification still functions correctly for new user registrations
  4. Monitor for any signs of attempted exploitation prior to the upgrade (unauthorized 2FA enablement, suspicious account modifications)

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-56073 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-56073 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data