Path TraversalWeakness · CWE-22

CVE-2026-56078

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

PraisonAI before 1.5.115 has a path traversal vulnerability in the MultiAgentMonitor component. The application fails to sanitize agent IDs before using them in file path construction, allowing attackers to inject '../' sequences to escape the intended directory and access or modify arbitrary files on the system.

MitigationUpgrade to PraisonAI version 1.5.115 or later. As a temporary measure, implement strict input validation on agent IDs to reject any path traversal sequences before the fix is applied.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed PraisonAI version
    Run 'pip show praisonai' or 'pip list | grep praisonai' to find the installed version number
    Affected if Version is lower than 1.5.115
  2. Identify if MultiAgentMonitor component is in use
    Search your codebase or application logs for imports or usage of 'MultiAgentMonitor' class or module
    Affected if MultiAgentMonitor is imported or instantiated in your application code
  3. Locate agent ID handling in MultiAgentMonitor
    Inspect the MultiAgentMonitor source file (typically in the agents or monitoring directory) and locate where agent IDs are used in file path operations (os.path.join, open(), or similar)
    Affected if The code uses agent IDs directly in file path construction without sanitization
  4. Test for path traversal vulnerability in agent ID input
    If you have access to the agent ID input field or API parameter, observe whether input containing '../' sequences is accepted or filtered (for example, provide an agent ID like '../../etc/passwd' and check the resulting file access path)
    Affected if The application accepts and processes path traversal sequences in agent IDs without rejecting them
  5. Review application logs for suspicious path access
    Check application logs for any file access attempts that escape the intended agent data directory (look for '../' patterns or access to files outside the designated agent directory)
    Affected if Logs show file access attempts with '../' sequences or access to unexpected directories triggered by agent IDs

You are affected if you are running PraisonAI version before 1.5.115 and the MultiAgentMonitor component processes agent IDs without path traversal sanitization.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to PraisonAI version 1.5.115 or later. As a temporary measure, implement strict input validation on agent IDs to reject any path traversal sequences before the fix is applied.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.5.115

  1. 1. Identify the current installed version of PraisonAI by running `pip show praisonai` or checking your dependency files
  2. 2. If the current version is below 1.5.115, upgrade to version 1.5.115 or later using `pip install --upgrade praisonai`
  3. 3. Verify the upgrade was successful by running `pip show praisonai` and confirming the version number
  4. 4. Test that the MultiAgentMonitor functionality works correctly after the upgrade
  5. 5. If using a requirements.txt or poetry.lock file, update the version constraint to specify `praisonai>=1.5.115` and run `pip install -r requirements.txt` or `poetry update` to lock the fixed version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-56078 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-56078 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data