CVE-2026-5619
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw has been found in Braffolk mcp-summarization-functions up to 0.1.5. This impacts an unknown function of the file src/server/mcp-server.ts of the component summarize_command. Executing a manipulation of the argument command can lead to os command injection. The attack requires local access. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOS command injection vulnerability in Braffolk mcp-summarization-functions (up to 0.1.5) within the summarize_command component in src/server/mcp-server.ts. An attacker with local access can manipulate the command argument to execute arbitrary OS commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Braffolk mcp-summarization-functions is installedRun 'npm list mcp-summarization-functions' or check package.json dependenciesAffected if The package appears in installed dependencies or package.json
-
Verify the installed versionRun 'npm list mcp-summarization-functions' to get the version numberAffected if Version is 0.1.5 or lower
-
Locate the vulnerable componentSearch for src/server/mcp-server.ts in the project directoryAffected if The file exists and contains the summarize_command component
-
Confirm summarize_command is exposedInspect the MCP server configuration and exposed methods in mcp-server.ts for the 'command' parameter handlingAffected if The 'command' argument is accepted and passed to shell execution functions such as exec() or spawn() without sanitization
-
Determine if untrusted input can reach the command parameterReview how the summarize_command is invoked and whether external/local untrusted input is passed to the 'command' argumentAffected if The 'command' parameter accepts user-supplied or network-provided input without validation
You are affected if Braffolk mcp-summarization-functions version 0.1.5 or lower is installed and the summarize_command component with its 'command' parameter is exposed to untrusted input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a version beyond 0.1.5 once available, and implement strict input validation or use parameterized/safe APIs instead of shell execution for the summarize_command component.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5619 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5619 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data