Information ExposureWeakness · CWE-200

CVE-2026-56218

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Capgo before 12.128.2 fails to strip EXIF metadata including GPS geolocation data from uploaded images, allowing information disclosure. Attackers can download uploaded images and extract precise latitude and longitude coordinates revealing user physical location at capture time.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Capgo before version 12.128.2 does not strip EXIF metadata from uploaded images. When users upload images (e.g., profile photos or attachments), the GPS geolocation data embedded in the EXIF headers remains intact. An attacker who accesses or downloads these uploaded images can extract the precise latitude and longitude coordinates, revealing the physical location where the image was captured.

MitigationUpgrade to Capgo version 12.128.2 or later, which implements proper EXIF metadata stripping during image uploads. As a compensating control, restrict access to uploaded files and monitor for unauthorized downloads.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Capgo installation and version
    Locate the Capgo application installation directory and check the package.json, version file, or application metadata to determine the installed version number.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 12.128.2 (e.g., 12.128.1, 12.120.0, etc.)
  2. Confirm image upload feature is enabled
    Check Capgo configuration files or admin settings to verify that user-generated image uploads (profile photos, attachments, or media uploads) are enabled.
    Affected if Image uploads are enabled and users can upload image files to the system
  3. Extract EXIF metadata from a recently uploaded test image
    Use a tool such as exiftool, exiv2, or an online EXIF viewer to inspect a sample uploaded image file and check for GPS coordinates in the EXIF headers (e.g., GPSLatitude, GPSLongitude, or GPSPosition tags).
    Affected if The uploaded image file retains EXIF metadata including GPS location data (latitude and longitude coordinates are present in the file)

A user is affected if they are running Capgo versions before 12.128.2 AND the image upload feature is enabled, resulting in uploaded images containing EXIF GPS coordinates.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to Capgo version 12.128.2 or later, which implements proper EXIF metadata stripping during image uploads. As a compensating control, restrict access to uploaded files and monitor for unauthorized downloads.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

12.128.2

  1. Identify the current Capgo version in use by checking the package.json or running the relevant version command
  2. Upgrade Capgo to version 12.128.2 or later by running the appropriate package manager update command (e.g., npm update @capgo/capacitor-updater or the relevant package)
  3. After upgrading, test image upload functionality to confirm EXIF metadata (including GPS coordinates) is now being stripped from uploaded images
  4. Verify by uploading a test image with embedded GPS data and attempting to extract metadata from the downloaded image to confirm it has been removed
  5. Review the release notes for 12.128.2 to ensure all changes are understood

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,220
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,952.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-56218 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-56218 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data