CVE-2026-56293
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCapgo before 12.128.2 contains an authorization flaw in transfer_app() that fails to update deploy_history.owner_org when transferring applications between organizations. Attackers can exploit this omission to retain unauthorized access to deployment history records in the source organization or cause the destination organization to lose access to transferred application deployment records.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCapgo before 12.128.2 has an authorization flaw in the transfer_app() function where deploy_history.owner_org is not updated when applications are transferred between organizations. This causes deployment history records to retain the source organization's ownership, allowing attackers to maintain unauthorized access to those records or causing the destination organization to lose access to transferred application deployment history.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Capgo versionLocate the installed Capgo version by querying the package manager, checking the application dashboard, or running a version command specific to your Capgo installation. Compare it against the affected range (versions before 12.128.2).Affected if The installed version is before 12.128.2
-
Identify transferred applicationsReview application transfer logs or audit records to determine if any applications have been transferred between different organizations within your Capgo instance.Affected if Any applications have been transferred between organizations
-
Examine deploy_history ownershipQuery the deploy_history table or records for transferred applications and compare the owner_org field against the current organization owning the application. Look for mismatches where deploy_history.owner_org differs from the destination organization.Affected if The deploy_history.owner_org value does not match the current organization that owns the transferred application, or the destination organization cannot access deployment history for a transferred application
A user is affected if running a Capgo version before 12.128.2 AND applications have been transferred between organizations, resulting in deployment history records with stale owner_org values pointing to the source organization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Capgo to version 12.128.2 or later. Additionally, audit existing application transfers to correct deploy_history.owner_org values for any applications transferred prior to the fix.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-56293 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-56293 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data