Improper AuthenticationWeakness · CWE-287

CVE-2026-5632

HIGH · 7.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
82/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability was found in assafelovic gpt-researcher up to 3.4.3. This impacts an unknown function of the component HTTP REST API Endpoint. Performing a manipulation results in missing authentication. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The gpt-researcher application up to version 3.4.3 has a missing authentication vulnerability in its HTTP REST API endpoint, allowing remote unauthenticated attackers to access API functions that should require authentication.

MitigationImplement proper authentication and authorization controls on all REST API endpoints. Consider network-level restrictions (e.g., firewall rules, VPN) as an interim measure until a patched version is released by the vendor.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify gpt-researcher installation and version
    Run 'pip show gpt-researcher' or check your package manager for the installed version. If running from source, check the version file or git tag.
    Affected if The installed version is 3.4.3 or lower, or if you cannot confirm a version higher than 3.4.3.
  2. Confirm the REST API is enabled
    Check the application configuration files (such as config.py, settings.py, or any .env file) for API-related settings like 'API_ENABLED', 'REST_API', or similar flags that control REST API functionality.
    Affected if The REST API functionality is enabled in the configuration.
  3. Locate API endpoint definitions
    Search the codebase for API route definitions, typically in files containing 'api', 'routes', or 'endpoints' in their names. Look for FastAPI, Flask, or similar framework decorators like @app.get, @app.post.
    Affected if REST API endpoint definitions exist and the API is operational.
  4. Check API authentication configuration
    Review the API configuration or middleware files for authentication-related settings such as 'API_KEY', 'AUTH_REQUIRED', 'BEARER_TOKEN', or similar. Compare these settings against the expected secure configuration.
    Affected if Authentication is not enforced on API endpoints, or authentication settings are missing, disabled, or improperly configured.
  5. Assess network exposure of the API service
    Check if the API binds to 0.0.0.0 or a publicly routable IP address rather than localhost. Review firewall rules or reverse proxy configuration that may expose the API to untrusted networks.
    Affected if The API is accessible from network interfaces other than localhost, or is exposed to untrusted networks without additional access controls.

You are affected if gpt-researcher version 3.4.3 or lower is installed, the REST API is enabled, and authentication controls are missing or disabled on the API endpoints.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authentication and authorization controls on all REST API endpoints. Consider network-level restrictions (e.g., firewall rules, VPN) as an interim measure until a patched version is released by the vendor.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5632 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5632 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data