CVE-2026-56356
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedn8n contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Chat Trigger node's Custom CSS field due to a misconfiguration of the sanitize-html library. Affected releases are those before 1.123.27, the 2.0.0 through 2.13.2 line, and 2.14.0 (fixed in 1.123.27, 2.13.3, and 2.14.1). An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows can inject JavaScript that bypasses sanitization, resulting in stored XSS against any user who visits the public chat page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencen8n contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Chat Trigger node's Custom CSS field. The sanitize-html library is misconfigured, allowing authenticated users with workflow creation/modification permissions to inject malicious JavaScript that bypasses sanitization. This payload executes against any user who visits the affected public chat page.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.123.27>= 2.0.0, < 2.13.3= 2.14.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed n8n versionRun `n8n --version` from the command line, or log into the n8n web interface and navigate to Settings > About to view the version number.Affected if The version is less than 1.123.27, or between 2.0.0 and 2.13.3 inclusive, or exactly 2.14.0.
-
Identify workflows using Chat Trigger nodesExport all workflows or query the database for workflows containing a node with type 'n8n-nodes-base.chatTrigger' or 'chatTrigger'. Each workflow JSON will contain a 'nodes' array - inspect each for a node with name or type containing 'chat' or 'Chat' that has a Custom CSS field.Affected if Any workflow contains a Chat Trigger node with a non-empty Custom CSS field.
-
Inspect Custom CSS content in Chat Trigger nodesFor each Chat Trigger node found, examine the node parameters for a field named 'customCss' or 'css'. Review the CSS content for any suspicious patterns such as JavaScript event handlers (onclick, onload, onerror), javascript: URLs, or HTML-like markup that may have bypassed sanitization.Affected if The Custom CSS field contains any JavaScript event handlers, javascript: protocols, or HTML tags that were not stripped by sanitization.
-
Determine if affected Chat Trigger workflows are activeCheck the workflow status in n8n. Active Chat Trigger workflows expose a public webhook URL (typically under /webhook/ or /chat/ path). Verify which workflow IDs are enabled by checking the 'active' flag in workflow settings or the UI toggle.Affected if A workflow with a vulnerable Chat Trigger configuration is set to active and its webhook URL is publicly accessible.
You are affected if your n8n version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND you have an active workflow containing a Chat Trigger node with a populated Custom CSS field that contains unsanitized JavaScript or HTML.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.123.272.13.3
Upgrade to n8n versions 1.123.27, 2.13.3, or 2.14.1 or later to receive the patched sanitize-html configuration. Review existing workflows for any malicious Custom CSS entries.
1.123.27 (for 1.x branch), 2.13.3 (for 2.0.0-2.13.x branch), or 2.14.1 (for 2.14.x branch)
- Identify the current n8n version running in your environment
- If running version 1.x (< 1.123.27): upgrade to version 1.123.27 or later
- If running version 2.0.0 through 2.13.2: upgrade to version 2.13.3 or later
- If running version 2.14.0: upgrade to version 2.14.1 or later
- After upgrade, verify the Chat Trigger node's Custom CSS field sanitization is working correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-56356 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-56356 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data