ImagemagickApplication

CVE-2026-56368

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-24
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.9.13-40 / 7.1.2-15 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click 8 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
ImageMagick before 7.1.2-15 contains a memory leak vulnerability in multiple coders that write raw pixel data where allocated objects are not properly freed. Attackers can trigger this leak by processing specially crafted images, causing memory exhaustion and denial of service.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-15 contains a memory leak in multiple coders that handle raw pixel data. When processing specially crafted images, allocated memory objects are not properly freed, leading to unbounded memory growth and eventual denial of service through memory exhaustion.

MitigationUpgrade to ImageMagick 7.1.2-15 or later to obtain the patched version. Additionally, implement resource limits (e.g., memory caps, processing timeouts) on image processing services as a defense-in-depth measure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ImagemagickApplication
Affected:< 6.9.13-40>= 7.0.0-0, < 7.1.2-15

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify ImageMagick version
    Run `convert --version` or `magick --version` from command line. If using ImageMagick 6, also try `identify -version`. Record the exact version number shown (e.g., 7.1.2-10 or 6.9.12-35).
    Affected if The version displayed is earlier than 6.9.13-40 for the 6.x branch, OR falls between 7.0.0-0 and 7.1.2-14 for the 7.x branch.
  2. Confirm package manager version
    On Debian/Ubuntu run `dpkg -l | grep -i imagemagick`. On RHEL/CentOS run `rpm -qa | grep -i imagemagick`. On macOS with Homebrew run `brew list imagemagick`. Verify the version number matches what was found in step 1.
    Affected if The installed package version matches the vulnerable ranges from step 1.
  3. Check for active ImageMagick processes
    Run `ps aux | grep -i magick` or `pgrep -a -i magick` to see if ImageMagick is currently processing images or running as a service (e.g., a web application using ImageMagick).
    Affected if ImageMagick is actively processing images and the version is in the affected range - memory leak can occur during such processing.
  4. Verify raw pixel coders are available
    Run `convert -list configure | grep DELEGATES` or check coders with `convert -list coder`. Look for raw pixel format support (like grayscale, rgb, or unspecified raw formats).
    Affected if Raw pixel format coders are present and the version is vulnerable - these are the coders where the memory leak occurs.

You are affected if ImageMagick version is below 6.9.13-40 (6.x branch) or between 7.0.0-0 and 7.1.2-14 (7.x branch), and the application processes images using raw pixel data coders.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.9.13-40 / 7.1.2-15 or later
Fixed in 6.9.13-407.1.2-15
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to ImageMagick 7.1.2-15 or later to obtain the patched version. Additionally, implement resource limits (e.g., memory caps, processing timeouts) on image processing services as a defense-in-depth measure.

Recommended fix High confidence

7.1.2-15 (for 7.x branch) or 6.9.13-40 (for 6.x branch)

  1. 1. Check current ImageMagick version using 'convert -version' or 'magick -version'
  2. 2. For ImageMagick 7.x users: upgrade to version 7.1.2-15 or later
  3. 3. For ImageMagick 6.x users: upgrade to version 6.9.13-40 or later
  4. 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by running 'convert -version' and confirming the version number
  5. 5. Test image processing workflows to ensure normal operation
Caveat Review release notes for any behavioral changes between versions; test critical image processing workflows before production deployment

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Imagemagick Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-56368 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-56368 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data