CVE-2026-5663
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security flaw has been discovered in OFFIS DCMTK up to 3.7.0. This impacts the function executeOnReception/executeOnEndOfStudy of the file dcmnet/apps/storescp.cc of the component storescp. Performing a manipulation results in os command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The patch is named edbb085e45788dccaf0e64d71534cfca925784b8. Applying a patch is the recommended action to fix this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA command injection vulnerability exists in OFFIS DCMTK storescp application (dcmnet/apps/storescp.cc). The executeOnReception and executeOnEndOfStudy functions improperly handle user input, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands. This is remotely exploitable with CVSS 9.8 critical severity.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify storescp installationRun 'storescp -h' or 'which storescp' to confirm the DCMTK storescp binary is present on the systemAffected if storescp binary is found on the system
-
Determine DCMTK versionRun 'storescp -v' or 'dcmdump -v' to retrieve the installed DCMTK version numberAffected if Installed version is 3.7.0 or lower
-
Identify executeOnReception configurationSearch configuration files and command-line arguments for 'executeOnReception' or the shorthand '-xec' to see if this feature is enabledAffected if executeOnReception is configured with user-controlled input
-
Identify executeOnEndOfStudy configurationSearch configuration files and command-line arguments for 'executeOnEndOfStudy' or the shorthand '-xest' to see if this feature is enabledAffected if executeOnEndOfStudy is configured with user-controlled input
-
Inspect runtime parametersReview how storescp is invoked (startup scripts, systemd unit files, cron jobs) to examine all parameters passed to the executeOnReception or executeOnEndOfStudy optionsAffected if The parameters to these functions are derived from external/dicom network input without validation
A system is affected if DCMTK storescp version 3.7.0 or lower is installed AND the executeOnReception or executeOnEndOfStudy features are enabled with externally-sourced parameters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the provided patch (edbb085e45788dccaf0e64d71534cfca925784b8) to implement proper input sanitization/validation on the executeOnReception and executeOnEndOfStudy function parameters, or upgrade to a patched version of DCMTK.
DCMTK 3.7.1 or later (the first release containing commit edbb085e45788dccaf0e64d71534cfca925784b8)
- 1. Identify the current DCMTK version in use by running 'storescp -v' or checking the package version
- 2. Since this is a command injection vulnerability in storescp's executeOnReception/executeOnEndOfStudy handlers, immediately restrict network exposure of the storescp service
- 3. If patches cannot be applied immediately, disable the executeOnReception and executeOnEndOfStudy configuration options in storescp to prevent exploitation
- 4. Upgrade to DCMTK version 3.7.1 or later which contains the security fix for this command injection vulnerability
- 5. After upgrading, verify the patch commit edbb085e45788dccaf0e64d71534cfca925784b8 is included in the new version
- 6. Test the storescp application to ensure normal DICOM storage functionality works correctly after upgrade
- 7. Re-enable network access to storescp only after confirming the upgrade is successful
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5663 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5663 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data