CVE-2026-56648
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedTime-of-check time-of-use (toctou) race condition in Windows Network File System allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
In the news
Third-party coverage- Microsoft July 2026 Patch Tuesday fixes massive 570 flaws, 3 zero-days
- Microsoft CVE Summary - Bleeping Computer
Surfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition vulnerability exists in Windows Network File System (NFS). An authorized attacker who can send network requests to the NFS service can exploit the race window between checking a security-relevant condition and using the result of that check to elevate privileges to a higher level.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.9339< 10.0.17763.9020< 10.0.19044.7548< 10.0.19045.7548< 10.0.26100.8875< 10.0.26200.8875< 10.0.28000.2269all versions= r2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify NFS service is installed and runningOpen Services console (services.msc) and look for 'Server for NFS' or 'NFS Service' status, or run 'Get-Service -Name *NFS*' in PowerShellAffected if NFS service is installed and running - the vulnerability only applies when the NFS service is accessible
-
Check Windows version against affected rangesRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' and compare the build number to the affected version rangesAffected if Build number is less than the specified threshold for your Windows version (e.g., < 10.0.14393.9339 for Windows 10 1607, < 10.0.17763.9020 for Windows 10 1809, etc.)
-
Verify NFS is exposed to networkCheck NFS server configuration in Windows Features (enable Windows Features for NFS) or via Registry: HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\ForGames\Config, or check if NFS ports (2049/TCP and 2049/UDP) are listening with 'netstat -an | findstr 2049'Affected if NFS ports are listening and accessible from the network - the attacker needs to send network requests to the NFS service to exploit the race condition
You are affected if the NFS service is running, your Windows build is below the version threshold, and NFS is network-accessible to an attacker.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.933910.0.17763.902010.0.19044.7548
Apply the applicable Microsoft security patch for this vulnerability when released. Until then, restrict network access to NFS services to trusted users and monitor for suspicious privilege escalation attempts.
Windows 10/11: Latest cumulative update (minimum versions listed above). Windows Server 2012/R2: Upgrade to Windows Server 2019/2022/2025 (no patch available for EOL product)
- Open Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update (or Server Manager > Local Server for Windows Server)
- Check for updates and install the latest Windows cumulative/security update
- Verify the installed version matches or exceeds: 10.0.14393.9339 (Win10 1607), 10.0.17763.9020 (Win10 1809), 10.0.19044.7548 (Win10 21h2), 10.0.19045.7548 (Win10 22h2), 10.0.26100.8875 (Win11 24h2), 10.0.26200.8875 (Win11 25h2), or 10.0.28000.2269 (Win11 26h1)
- Restart the system when prompted
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-56648 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-56648 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data