CVE-2026-56777
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedn8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencen8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.2 contains an AST security validator bypass in the Python Code node. Authenticated users with workflow create/modify permissions can bypass the validator to access the task executor module namespace. When the Python Task Runner is enabled and N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can expose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.25.7>= 2.26.0, < 2.26.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check n8n versionRun 'n8n --version' or check the version displayed in the UI footer. Alternatively, inspect the package.json file in the n8n installation directory.Affected if Version is before 2.25.7 or between 2.26.0 and 2.26.1 (inclusive)
-
Verify Python Task Runner is enabledCheck the n8n configuration file (config.yaml or environment variables) for settings related to Python Task Runner, or inspect the task runner settings in the n8n UI under Settings > Processors.Affected if Python Task Runner is enabled and active
-
Inspect N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS settingCheck the environment variable N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS or the corresponding config.yaml setting. Run 'echo $N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS' or review the configuration file.Affected if N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is not set to a restrictive value (such as 'true' or '1') or is missing entirely, allowing environment variable access
-
Confirm user permissionsReview which users or roles have workflow create or modify permissions in the n8n user management settings or in your authentication provider if using SSO.Affected if Any authenticated user has workflow create or modify permissions (this is the prerequisite for exploitation)
You are affected if your n8n version is vulnerable AND the Python Task Runner is enabled AND N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is not configured to block environment variable access, AND untrusted users have workflow create/modify permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.25.72.26.2
Upgrade n8n to version 2.25.7 or 2.26.2 or later. Ensure N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is properly configured to restrict environment variable access, and review user permissions for workflow creation/modification in self-hosted instances.
n8n version 2.25.7 (2.25.x branch) or version 2.26.2 (2.26.x branch)
- Upgrade n8n to version 2.25.7 or later if using the 2.25.x branch
- OR upgrade n8n to version 2.26.2 or later if using the 2.26.x branch
- After upgrading, verify that the Python Code node AST validator is functioning correctly
- If you previously configured N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS to allow environment variable access, review whether this configuration is still needed post-patch
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-56777 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-56777 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data