CVE-2026-5678
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA weakness has been identified in Totolink A7100RU 7.4cu.2313_b20191024. The affected element is the function setScheduleCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Executing a manipulation of the argument mode can lead to os command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOS command injection vulnerability in Totolink A7100RU router firmware 7.4cu.2313_b20191024. The setScheduleCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi fails to properly sanitize the 'mode' argument, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands via the CGI interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelAccess the router's web interface or check the device label/metadata to confirm the model is Totolink A7100RUAffected if Device is not a Totolink A7100RU model
-
Check CGI interface accessibilityVerify that the web interface and /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi endpoint is reachable from the networkAffected if The CGI interface is exposed and accessible
-
Verify setScheduleCfg function existsInspect the firmware or attempt a benign request to the cstecgi.cgi endpoint with the setScheduleCfg action to confirm the function is presentAffected if The setScheduleCfg function is implemented in the firmware
-
Confirm mode parameter is acceptedTest whether the CGI endpoint accepts the 'mode' parameter in the setScheduleCfg actionAffected if The 'mode' parameter is accepted by the CGI interface
-
Compare firmware versionCheck the installed firmware version in the router's system settings or by extracting the firmware image; compare against any vendor-released version informationAffected if Firmware version matches the affected range (if specified by vendor) or is an unpatched version
The environment is affected if the device is a Totolink A7100RU with accessible CGI interface where the setScheduleCfg function accepts a 'mode' parameter without proper sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate router firmware to a patched version if available; otherwise, restrict network access to the web management interface (port 80/443) or disable the device until a patch is released.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5678 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5678 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data