OS Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-78

CVE-2026-56808

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v3.0 Published 2026-06-30
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click 7 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
DGM3103SCT provided by AVTECH Security Corporation contains an OS command injection vulnerability, which may lead to arbitrary command execution with the root privilege by a user who can log in to the web management console of the affected product.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The DGM3103SCT surveillance device from AVTECH Security Corporation contains an OS command injection vulnerability in its web management console. An authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary OS commands through web interface input fields, which are then executed with root privileges on the underlying Linux system.

MitigationRestrict web management console access to trusted users only using strong authentication, implement strict input validation and sanitization on all user-supplied parameters before passing them to system calls, and apply vendor patches when available. Consider network segmentation to minimize exposure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify device model
    Check the physical device label, firmware boot screen, or web interface header for model number DGM3103SCT. Access the device web portal and look for model identification in system information or device status pages.
    Affected if The device is a DGM3103SCT from AVTECH Security Corporation
  2. Confirm web management console is accessible
    Attempt to access the device web interface via HTTP/HTTPS on typical ports such as 80, 443, or 8080. Check if the login page or management console loads.
    Affected if The web management console is reachable on the network
  3. Verify authentication is required
    Check if the web interface requires login credentials before allowing access to management functions. Attempt to access protected pages without credentials to confirm authentication is enforced.
    Affected if Authentication is NOT required or is easily bypassed, meaning any attacker can reach the injection points
  4. Identify input fields in web interface
    Log into the web management console and navigate through settings pages (network configuration, system settings, or similar). Locate text input fields, parameter fields, or configuration options that may accept user-supplied data.
    Affected if The web interface contains input fields that accept user data and could potentially pass this to system calls

You are affected if you have a DGM3103SCT device with an accessible web management console that either lacks authentication or allows authenticated users to submit input through web fields that could trigger OS command execution.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict web management console access to trusted users only using strong authentication, implement strict input validation and sanitization on all user-supplied parameters before passing them to system calls, and apply vendor patches when available. Consider network segmentation to minimize exposure.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
34.0 hours of engineering $6,000
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-56808 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-56808 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data