CVE-2026-5690
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw has been found in Totolink A7100RU 7.4cu.2313_b20191024. The impacted element is the function setRemoteCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Executing a manipulation of the argument enable can lead to os command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOS command injection vulnerability in Totolink A7100RU router firmware 7.4cu.2313_b20191024. The setRemoteCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi fails to sanitize the 'enable' parameter, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via the web interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelAccess the router admin web interface or check the device label to confirm it is a Totolink A7100RU model.Affected if The device is not a Totolink A7100RU router.
-
Check the firmware versionLog into the router web interface and navigate to the Status or System Information page to view the installed firmware version. Alternatively, check the firmware file name if you have access to the firmware binary.Affected if The firmware version is 7.4cu.2313_b20191024 (the affected version).
-
Verify the vulnerable CGI binary existsAttempt to access the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi via the router web interface or check the firmware filesystem if you can extract it.Affected if The file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi does not exist on the device.
-
Confirm remote management is enabledIn the router web interface, look for 'Remote Management', 'Remote Access', or 'TR-069' settings under the Administration or Advanced settings. Check if the 'enable' option for remote management is turned on.Affected if Remote management is enabled and accessible.
-
Check network exposure of the web interfaceDetermine if the router admin interface (port 80/443) is reachable from the internet by attempting an external connection test or reviewing firewall rules.Affected if The router web interface is exposed directly to the internet.
You are affected if you have a Totolink A7100RU router running firmware version 7.4cu.2313_b20191024 with the vulnerable /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi binary present and remote management enabled or the web interface exposed externally.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware patch if available; if no patch exists, disable remote management access from untrusted networks or replace the device.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5690 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5690 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data