CVE-2026-57026
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in the SIP plugin of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series with SPC3 and SRX Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS).If the SIP ALG is enabled on an affected device, the processing of a malformed SIP invite packet will cause a flow processing daemon (flowd) crash and restart. This leads to a complete service outage until the system has automatically recovered. This issue affects Junos OS on MX Series with SPC3 and SRX Series: * all versions before 23.2R2-S7, * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S8, * 24.2 versions before 24.2R2-S5, * 24.4 versions before 24.4R2-S4, * 25.2 versions before 25.2R2, * 25.4 versions before 25.4R1-S2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the SIP ALG plugin of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series (with SPC3) and SRX Series allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause denial of service by sending a malformed SIP invite packet. The attack triggers a flowd daemon crash and restart, resulting in complete service outage until auto-recovery.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 23.2= 23.2= 23.4= 24.2= 24.4= 25.2= 25.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelRun 'show chassis hardware' or check device model to confirm it is an MX Series (with SPC3) or SRX Series deviceAffected if Device is not an MX Series or SRX Series, then not affected by this specific vulnerability
-
Check installed Junos OS versionRun 'show version' to obtain the Junos OS version numberAffected if Version matches or falls within the affected list: < 23.2, 23.2, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4, 25.2, or 25.4
-
Verify SIP ALG is enabledRun 'show security alg status' or 'show configuration security alg sip' to check if the SIP Application Layer Gateway is enabledAffected if SIP ALG is enabled and running on the device, making it vulnerable to malformed SIP packets
-
Check for flowd daemon crashesRun 'show system core-dumps' or check '/var/log/messages' for flowd or crash-related entries, particularly around SIP processingAffected if Recent flowd crashes are found with SIP invite packet patterns, indicating potential exploitation
Device is affected if it is an MX Series or SRX Series running an affected Junos version with SIP ALG enabled, and the vulnerability can be triggered by malformed SIP invite packets causing flowd crashes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped23.2
Disable the SIP ALG if not required, or upgrade Junos OS to a patched version (23.2R2-S7, 23.4R2-S8, 24.2R2-S5, 24.4R2-S4, 25.2R2, or 25.4R1-S2 or later) to remediate this vulnerability.
23.2R2-S7, 23.4R2-S8, 24.2R2-S5, 24.4R2-S4, 25.2R2, or 25.4R1-S2 (depending on which branch you are on)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version on the MX Series (with SPC3) or SRX Series device using 'show version'
- 2. If SIP ALG is enabled and cannot upgrade immediately, disable SIP ALG as a mitigation: Enter configuration mode and run 'set security alg sip disable', then commit the change
- 3. Plan upgrade to a fixed release: For 23.2 branch, upgrade to 23.2R2-S7 or later; for 23.4 branch, upgrade to 23.4R2-S8 or later; for 24.2 branch, upgrade to 24.2R2-S5 or later; for 24.4 branch, upgrade to 24.4R2-S4 or later; for 25.2 branch, upgrade to 25.2R2 or later; for 25.4 branch, upgrade to 25.4R1-S2 or later
- 4. Download the appropriate Junos OS upgrade package from the Juniper Networks support portal
- 5. Upload the upgrade package to the device and initiate the upgrade following standard Junos upgrade procedures
- 6. After upgrade, verify the new version is installed and SIP ALG functionality is restored if needed using 'set security alg sip enable' (enabled by default in later versions)
- 7. Confirm the device is functioning normally post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-57026 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-57026 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data