CVE-2026-57054
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Use of Incorrectly-Resolved Name or Reference vulnerability in the URL filtering plugin of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to bypass web filtering and access downstream resources that should be unreachable. If an MX Series device is configured with web filtering, and an attacker sends a request with a specifically formatted URL, this request will get forwarded despite the system being configured to block it. In turn, an attacker can access downstream resources that are expected to be unreachable. This issue affects Junos OS on MX Series: * all versions before 23.2R2-S7, * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S8, * 24.2 versions before 24.2R2-S5, * 24.4 versions before 24.4R2-S4, * 25.2 versions before 25.2R2-S1, * 25.4 versions before 25.4R1-S2, 25.4R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA Use of Incorrectly-Resolved Name or Reference vulnerability in the URL filtering plugin of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to bypass web filtering by sending a specifically formatted URL. This causes blocked requests to be forwarded to downstream resources that should be unreachable, effectively circumventing the intended security policy.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 23.2= 23.2= 23.4= 24.2= 24.4= 25.2= 25.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify device is MX SeriesRun 'show chassis hardware' or 'show system information' to confirm the device model is MX-seriesAffected if Device is not an MX Series router - this vulnerability only affects MX Series
-
Check Junos OS versionRun 'show version' to obtain the installed Junos OS versionAffected if Version is < 23.2, or equals 23.2, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4, 25.2, or 25.4 (any of the affected versions listed)
-
Confirm URL filtering is enabledRun 'show services url-filter status' or check the URL filtering configuration with 'show configuration | display set | match url-filter'Affected if URL filtering is not configured or enabled - the vulnerability only applies when URL filtering policy is active
The device is affected if it is an MX Series router running a vulnerable Junos OS version (23.2, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4, 25.2, 25.4 or any version below 23.2) AND has URL filtering enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped23.2
Apply the vendor-supplied Junos OS updates: upgrade to 23.2R2-S7 or later, 23.4R2-S8 or later, 24.2R2-S5 or later, 24.4R2-S4 or later, 25.2R2-S1 or later, or 25.4R1-S2/25.4R2 or later. Until patches are applied, implement additional network-level filtering or segmentation as a compensating control.
23.2R2-S7 / 23.4R2-S8 / 24.2R2-S5 / 24.4R2-S4 / 25.2R2-S1 / 25.4R1-S2 or later (depending on which release branch you are on)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version on the MX Series device using 'show version'
- 2. Review the current web filtering configuration with 'show configuration | display set | match web-filter'
- 3. Based on current version, upgrade to one of the fixed releases: 23.2R2-S7, 23.4R2-S8, 24.2R2-S5, 24.4R2-S4, 25.2R2-S1, or 25.4R1-S2/25.4R2
- 4. After upgrade, verify web filtering functionality is operational with 'show web-filter statistics'
- 5. Test that URL filtering is properly blocking requests that should be blocked
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-57054 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-57054 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data