CVE-2026-57093
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUse after free in Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
In the news
Third-party coverage- Microsoft July 2026 Patch Tuesday fixes massive 570 flaws, 3 zero-days
- Microsoft CVE Summary - Bleeping Computer
Surfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA use-after-free vulnerability exists in the Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock (Afd.sys), a kernel-mode driver that handles Winsock API calls. The flaw allows a locally authorized attacker to exploit a freed memory object to elevate privileges to SYSTEM level by achieving arbitrary code execution in kernel context.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.9339< 10.0.17763.9020< 10.0.19044.7548< 10.0.19045.7548< 10.0.26100.8875< 10.0.26200.8875< 10.0.28000.2269all versions= r2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows OS build versionRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Version"' to display the installed Windows build numberAffected if The build number falls below any of these thresholds: 14393.9339 (1607), 17763.9020 (1809), 19044.7548 (21h2), 19045.7548 (22h2), 26100.8875 (24h2), 26200.8875 (25h2), 28000.2269 (26h1); or if running Windows Server 2012 / 2012 R2 (all versions)
-
Check Afd.sys driver file versionRun 'powershell "(Get-Item C:\Windows\System32\drivers\Afd.sys).VersionInfo.FileVersion"' to retrieve the driver file versionAffected if The Afd.sys version is lower than the corresponding version for your Windows build (compare against the affected version ranges for your OS) or if running Windows Server 2012/2012 R2 where all versions are affected
-
Verify the driver is loadedRun 'sc query afd' or 'powershell "Get-Service -Name afd"' to check if the Afd service is runningAffected if The service is running (status = RUNNING); the vulnerability only applies when the driver is active to handle Winsock operations
-
Confirm local attacker perspectiveReview event logs or check for unauthorized local accounts that could exploit this privilege escalation vulnerabilityAffected if There are untrusted local users or compromised local accounts with authenticated access to the system
You are affected if your Windows build version or Afd.sys driver version is below the affected thresholds AND the Afd.sys driver is currently loaded and handling network operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.933910.0.17763.902010.0.19044.7548
Apply Microsoft security updates for Afd.sys through Windows Update or enterprise patch management systems. Prioritize endpoints based on exposure to local attackers.
For each affected Windows version, apply the latest cumulative security update that includes the fix for this vulnerability (KB references can be found at msrc.microsoft.com for the corresponding CVE)
- Open Windows Update on the affected system (Start > Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update)
- Click 'Check for updates' and install all available security updates
- Alternatively, manually download and install the specific KB patch from the Microsoft Update Catalog corresponding to your Windows version and build
- Restart the system after applying the update
- Verify the installed version matches or exceeds the fixed build number for your Windows version using 'winver' or 'systeminfo'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-57093 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-57093 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data