CVE-2026-57253
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn abnormal image object causes the renderer to enter the wrong processing branch. When converting the scan lines, an invalid image buffer pointer is used, resulting in the application crashing.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a memory handling vulnerability in image rendering code where an abnormal or malformed image object causes the renderer to take an incorrect processing branch. During scan line conversion, an invalid (likely null or corrupted) image buffer pointer is dereferenced, causing the application to crash. This represents a denial-of-service vulnerability due to improper validation of image objects before pointer operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 13.2.4.24048>= 14.0.0.33046, <= 14.0.4.33508>= 2023.1.0.15510, <= 2023.3.0.23028>= 2024.1.0.23997, <= 2024.4.1.27687>= 2025.1.0.27937, <= 2025.3.0.35737>= 2026.1.0.36452, <= 2026.1.1.36485<= 2026.1.1.36485CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Foxit productCheck for Foxit PDF Editor or Foxit PDF Reader installation by looking in Program Files for Foxit Software folder, or check Windows Add/Remove Programs, or right-click the executable and view PropertiesAffected if Either Foxit PDF Editor or Foxit PDF Reader is installed
-
Get installed version numberIn Foxit, go to Help > About Foxit PDF (Editor/Reader). The version is displayed as a four-part number (e.g., 13.2.4.24048 or 2026.1.1.36485)Affected if Version cannot be determined or is not visible
-
Compare Editor version against affected rangesIf using Foxit PDF Editor, compare your version number to these ranges: <=13.2.4.24048; 14.0.0.33046 to 14.0.4.33508; 2023.1.0.15510 to 2023.3.0.23028; 2024.1.0.23997 to 2024.4.1.27687; 2025.1.0.27937 to 2025.3.0.35737; 2026.1.0.36452 to 2026.1.1.36485Affected if Version falls within any of these ranges
-
Compare Reader version against affected rangeIf using Foxit PDF Reader, compare your version number to <=2026.1.1.36485Affected if Version is 2026.1.1.36485 or lower
You are affected if Foxit PDF Editor or Reader is installed and the version falls within the specified vulnerable ranges.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement rigorous validation of image objects and buffer pointers before scan line processing, ensuring proper error handling for abnormal image formats to prevent invalid pointer dereferences.
Pdf Editor: latest version (14.x or 2025+); Pdf Reader: 2026.1.2 or later
- 1. Identify the currently installed Foxit Pdf Editor or Pdf Reader version from the application (Help > About)
- 2. For Pdf Editor: If version is 13.2.x, upgrade to 13.2.5 or later (or migrate to a newer version line)
- 3. For Pdf Editor: If version is 14.0.x, upgrade to 14.0.5 or later
- 4. For Pdf Editor: If version is 2023.x, upgrade to 2023.4 or later
- 5. For Pdf Editor: If version is 2024.x, upgrade to 2025 or later (version 2024.5 or newer if available)
- 6. For Pdf Reader: Upgrade to version 2026.1.2 or later
- 7. Download updates only from the official Foxit website (www.foxit.com) or trusted enterprise distribution channels
- 8. Restart the application after upgrade and verify functionality with test PDF documents
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-57253 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-57253 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data