CWE-129Weakness · CWE-129

CVE-2026-57272

HIGH · 8.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
90/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges 8 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
GeoWebPlayer (also called "Web Plugin" in the GV-VMS documentation and "WS Player" for VMS-Cloud) is an addon that can be installed with various GeoVision software (GV-VMS, GV-Cloud, ...). It creates a websocket server that expands the capabilities of the various web-interfaces provided by the GeoVision software and may be necessary for them to function properly. The Websocket server can accept various commands coming from localhost. Many of the commands will take an `index` value that is then used to access various arrays to enter critical sections, perform various actions via function calls, etc. However the `index` value is usually not checked for valid range, and as such it can be used to access multiple arrays out-of-bound. #### byPass command index-out-of-bound

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

GeoWebPlayer's websocket server accepts commands with an unvalidated 'index' parameter used to access arrays. Without bounds checking, an attacker can supply an out-of-range index to access memory outside array boundaries, potentially reaching critical sections and triggering arbitrary function calls.

MitigationApply vendor patch when available; until then, restrict local access to the websocket server and monitor for anomalous index values in logs.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify GeoWebPlayer is installed
    Search for GeoWebPlayer executable or service on the system. Common locations: /usr/bin/, /usr/local/bin/, or check system services. On Windows, check Program Files directories.
    Affected if GeoWebPlayer application is found on the system
  2. Determine installed GeoWebPlayer version
    Run 'geowebplayer --version' or check the application's About/Version information. If installed as a service, check the service properties.
    Affected if Version is unknown, unpatched, or within any vulnerable range provided by the vendor
  3. Confirm websocket server is running
    Check if the GeoWebPlayer websocket server process is active. Use commands like 'ps aux | grep -i geowebplayer' on Linux or check services on Windows. Also check open ports (typically 8080 or similar) with 'netstat -an | grep LISTEN'.
    Affected if The websocket server process is running and listening on a network port
  4. Verify websocket server binding
    Check the configuration files or running process to determine if the websocket server binds to localhost only or is accessible over the network. Review configuration files in the GeoWebPlayer install directory.
    Affected if The websocket server binds to all interfaces (0.0.0.0) rather than localhost only, making it accessible remotely
  5. Review logs for anomalous websocket commands
    Examine GeoWebPlayer server logs for websocket commands containing unusual or out-of-range index parameter values. Look for error messages related to array access or memory operations.
    Affected if Logs show websocket commands with malformed index values or out-of-bounds access attempts

A user is affected if GeoWebPlayer with a vulnerable version is installed and its websocket server is running and accessible (especially if not restricted to localhost only).

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patch when available; until then, restrict local access to the websocket server and monitor for anomalous index values in logs.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
21.0 hours of engineering $3,680
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-57272 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-57272 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data