Classic Buffer OverflowWeakness · CWE-120

CVE-2026-57276

HIGH · 8.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
90/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges 8 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
GeoWebPlayer (also called "Web Plugin" in the GV-VMS documentation and "WS Player" for VMS-Cloud) is an addon that can be installed with various GeoVision software (GV-VMS, GV-Cloud, ...). It creates a websocket server that expands the capabilities of the various web-interfaces provided by the GeoVision software and may be necessary for them to function properly. The Websocket server can accept various commands coming from localhost. One of them, `connectionInfo` is meant to provide the necessary details to connect to a camera. The handler associated with this command that we call`handle_connection_info` contains multiple instances of string copy that can overflow. The function `handle_connect_info` copies attacker-controlled JSON strings into fixed-size buffers using manual byte-by-byte loops that do not enforce length limits. #### Buffer Overflow in password field (key present)

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

GeoWebPlayer's websocket server contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in the handle_connection_info function, which processes the 'connectionInfo' command. The function copies attacker-controlled JSON strings into fixed-size buffers using manual byte-by-byte loops without enforcing length limits, specifically in the password field. This allows remote attackers to overflow buffers by sending specially crafted JSON with excessively long string values.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of GeoWebPlayer that implements proper bounds checking and safe string handling in the handle_connection_info function. As a temporary mitigation, restrict network access to the websocket server to trusted localhost sources only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify GeoWebPlayer installation and version
    Locate the GeoWebPlayer installation directory and check for version information in product metadata, about dialog, or version file (e.g., version.txt, manifest.json, or binary resource). Compare your installed version against any publicly available version history.
    Affected if GeoWebPlayer is installed and the installed version falls within an affected range (if known) or cannot be determined to be patched.
  2. Verify websocket server component is enabled
    Inspect GeoWebPlayer configuration files or service settings to determine if the websocket server feature is active. Look for configuration keys related to websocket, network listeners, or the player server functionality.
    Affected if The websocket server component is enabled and accessible (particularly on localhost).
  3. Confirm handle_connection_info function exists
    If you have access to the GeoWebPlayer binary or source code, search for the handle_connection_info function. In binaries, use strings or a disassembler to locate the function name. In source, grep for 'handle_connection_info' in the codebase.
    Affected if The handle_connection_info function is present in the deployed version, indicating the potentially vulnerable code path exists.
  4. Inspect websocket command handling for password field
    Examine the websocket message handling code for the connectionInfo command. Look for how the password JSON field is processed and whether it involves buffer copy operations. Check for manual byte-by-byte loops copying data into fixed-size buffers.
    Affected if The connectionInfo command handler processes the password field using manual copy loops without apparent length validation before copying into fixed buffers.

GeoWebPlayer is affected if the websocket server is enabled, the handle_connection_info function is present, and the password field handling in the connectionInfo command uses manual buffer copying without length validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of GeoWebPlayer that implements proper bounds checking and safe string handling in the handle_connection_info function. As a temporary mitigation, restrict network access to the websocket server to trusted localhost sources only.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-57276 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-57276 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data