CVE-2026-57276
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGeoWebPlayer (also called "Web Plugin" in the GV-VMS documentation and "WS Player" for VMS-Cloud) is an addon that can be installed with various GeoVision software (GV-VMS, GV-Cloud, ...). It creates a websocket server that expands the capabilities of the various web-interfaces provided by the GeoVision software and may be necessary for them to function properly. The Websocket server can accept various commands coming from localhost. One of them, `connectionInfo` is meant to provide the necessary details to connect to a camera. The handler associated with this command that we call`handle_connection_info` contains multiple instances of string copy that can overflow. The function `handle_connect_info` copies attacker-controlled JSON strings into fixed-size buffers using manual byte-by-byte loops that do not enforce length limits. #### Buffer Overflow in password field (key present)
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGeoWebPlayer's websocket server contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in the handle_connection_info function, which processes the 'connectionInfo' command. The function copies attacker-controlled JSON strings into fixed-size buffers using manual byte-by-byte loops without enforcing length limits, specifically in the password field. This allows remote attackers to overflow buffers by sending specially crafted JSON with excessively long string values.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify GeoWebPlayer installation and versionLocate the GeoWebPlayer installation directory and check for version information in product metadata, about dialog, or version file (e.g., version.txt, manifest.json, or binary resource). Compare your installed version against any publicly available version history.Affected if GeoWebPlayer is installed and the installed version falls within an affected range (if known) or cannot be determined to be patched.
-
Verify websocket server component is enabledInspect GeoWebPlayer configuration files or service settings to determine if the websocket server feature is active. Look for configuration keys related to websocket, network listeners, or the player server functionality.Affected if The websocket server component is enabled and accessible (particularly on localhost).
-
Confirm handle_connection_info function existsIf you have access to the GeoWebPlayer binary or source code, search for the handle_connection_info function. In binaries, use strings or a disassembler to locate the function name. In source, grep for 'handle_connection_info' in the codebase.Affected if The handle_connection_info function is present in the deployed version, indicating the potentially vulnerable code path exists.
-
Inspect websocket command handling for password fieldExamine the websocket message handling code for the connectionInfo command. Look for how the password JSON field is processed and whether it involves buffer copy operations. Check for manual byte-by-byte loops copying data into fixed-size buffers.Affected if The connectionInfo command handler processes the password field using manual copy loops without apparent length validation before copying into fixed buffers.
GeoWebPlayer is affected if the websocket server is enabled, the handle_connection_info function is present, and the password field handling in the connectionInfo command uses manual buffer copying without length validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version of GeoWebPlayer that implements proper bounds checking and safe string handling in the handle_connection_info function. As a temporary mitigation, restrict network access to the websocket server to trusted localhost sources only.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-57276 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-57276 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data