CVE-2026-57277
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGeoWebPlayer (also called "Web Plugin" in the GV-VMS documentation and "WS Player" for VMS-Cloud) is an addon that can be installed with various GeoVision software (GV-VMS, GV-Cloud, ...). It creates a websocket server that expands the capabilities of the various web-interfaces provided by the GeoVision software and may be necessary for them to function properly. The Websocket server can accept various commands coming from localhost. One of them, `connectionInfo` is meant to provide the necessary details to connect to a camera. The handler associated with this command that we call`handle_connection_info` contains multiple instances of string copy that can overflow. The function `handle_connect_info` copies attacker-controlled JSON strings into fixed-size buffers using manual byte-by-byte loops that do not enforce length limits. #### Buffer Overflow in key field
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in GeoWebPlayer's websocket server handle_connection_info function. The function copies attacker-controlled JSON 'key' field data into fixed-size buffers using unsafe manual byte-by-byte loops without length validation. A local attacker can send oversized JSON key values to overflow destination buffers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify GeoWebPlayer installation and versionLocate GeoWebPlayer installation directory and check version information in application metadata, About dialog, or version file (e.g., version.txt, geowebplayer.ini). Compare against any known version ranges.Affected if GeoWebPlayer is installed and version falls within the affected range (if known) or is an unpatched version.
-
Verify websocket server component is enabledCheck GeoWebPlayer configuration files or service settings for websocket server settings. Look for entries like 'websocket', 'server', 'enable' in config files (e.g., geowebplayer.conf, settings.xml) or check if websocket service process is running.Affected if Websocket server is enabled and running, exposing the handle_connection_info function.
-
Check network exposure of websocket portIdentify the websocket server port (typically in configuration or via netstat/ss commands searching for LISTEN sockets related to GeoWebPlayer). Verify if the port is bound to non-localhost interfaces or exposed to untrusted networks.Affected if Websocket port is bound to 0.0.0.0 or an accessible network interface, allowing remote/local attackers to send malicious JSON.
-
Inspect websocket endpoint accessibilityIf configuration files are accessible, check for access control settings on websocket endpoints. Look for 'localhost_only', 'bind_address', or 'allow_external' configuration flags.Affected if Websocket server permits connections from non-localhost sources or lacks proper access restrictions.
-
Confirm handle_connection_info function is presentIf application binaries or source code are available, verify the handle_connection_info function exists in the websocket server component. For binaries, use strings, objdump, or a disassembler; for source, grep for the function name.Affected if The vulnerable handle_connection_info function is present in the deployed websocket server component.
The environment is affected if GeoWebPlayer with a websocket server containing the handle_connection_info function is installed, the websocket service is enabled, and it is accessible to potential attackers (not restricted to localhost only).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace unsafe string copy operations with bounds-checked functions (snprintf, strncpy, or safe string libraries) and add explicit length validation on JSON input fields before copying into fixed-size buffers. Restrict localhost websocket access as interim mitigation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-57277 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-57277 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data