Cross-site Scripting (XSS)Weakness · CWE-79

CVE-2026-57382

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges 5 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Mitchell Bennis Simple File List simple-file-list allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Simple File List: from n/a through <= 6.3.8.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Reflected XSS vulnerability in the Simple File List WordPress plugin allows remote attackers to inject malicious JavaScript through unsanitized user input that gets rendered in web pages without proper output encoding. The vulnerability exists in versions up to and including 6.3.8.

MitigationUpdate Simple File List to the latest patched version which implements proper input validation and output encoding, or apply a WAF rule to block XSS payloads in the interim while testing the update.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Simple File List plugin is installed
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Simple File List' in the list, or check the filesystem at wp-content/plugins/simple-file-list/ for the plugin files
    Affected if The plugin is present and active in the WordPress installation
  2. Check the installed plugin version
    In WordPress admin, view the plugin details page to see the version number, or open simple-file-list/readme.txt and look for the 'Stable tag' value
    Affected if The version is 6.3.8 or any earlier version (the affected range includes all versions up to and including 6.3.8)
  3. Confirm the plugin is accessible on the frontend
    Visit a page where the file list shortcode [eeSFL] or the file list is expected to display, or check if the shortcode is present in any published pages/posts
    Affected if The file list functionality is actively being used or exposed on the site
  4. Identify if user-supplied input is rendered in the file list
    Upload a test file with a filename containing a benign script tag (for example: test<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>.txt) and then view the file list page to see if the filename is rendered without encoding
    Affected if The filename or any user input field is displayed back to the browser without HTML entity encoding (the raw script tag appears in the page source)

A user is affected if Simple File List version 6.3.8 or earlier is installed, the plugin is active, and user-supplied input such as filenames are rendered in web pages without proper output encoding.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update Simple File List to the latest patched version which implements proper input validation and output encoding, or apply a WAF rule to block XSS payloads in the interim while testing the update.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-57382 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-57382 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data