CVE-2026-5755
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMattermost versions 11.6.x <= 11.6.0, 11.5.x <= 11.5.2, 11.5.x <= 11.5.3, 11.4.x <= 11.4.4, 10.11.x <= 10.11.14 fail to validate the TIFF IFD offset in the image header before allocating memory, which allows authenticated users with file upload or posting permissions to cause a denial of service (server OOM) via uploading a crafted TIFF file or posting a URL that serves one.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00648
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMattermost fails to validate the TIFF Image File Directory (IFD) offset in the image header before allocating memory, allowing authenticated users with file upload or posting permissions to trigger excessive memory allocation by uploading a crafted TIFF file or posting a URL serving one, resulting in server out-of-memory (OOM) condition and denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.11.0, < 10.11.15>= 11.4.0, < 11.4.5>= 11.5.0, < 11.5.3>= 11.6.0, < 11.6.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Mattermost Server versionRun 'grep -i version /opt/mattermost/config/config.json' or check the system package manager (e.g., 'mattermost --version' or 'rpm -q mattermost-server')Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: >=10.11.0 and <10.11.15, >=11.4.0 and <11.4.5, >=11.5.0 and <11.5.3, or >=11.6.0 and <11.6.1
-
Verify file upload capability is enabledIn Mattermost System Console, go to Posts > File Attachments, or inspect the config file at /opt/mattermost/config/config.json for 'EnableFileAttachments' set to trueAffected if File attachments are enabled for users who can post or upload files
-
Check for users with file upload permissionsIn Mattermost System Console, go to User Management > Users and review roles. Users with 'Team User', 'Channel User', or custom roles allowing file uploads can exploit this. Alternatively, query the database: SELECT username, roles FROM Users WHERE deleteat=0;Affected if Any authenticated user (excluding deactivated accounts) has permissions to upload or post files containing attachments
-
Identify uploaded TIFF files on the serverSearch the data directory (typically /opt/mattermost/data/) for .tiff or .tif files using 'find /opt/mattermost/data -type f \( -name "*.tiff" -o -name "*.tif" \)'Affected if TIFF files exist in the system, indicating potential exploitation vectors (though the vulnerability is triggered at upload time, not by existing files)
A user is affected if their Mattermost Server version is within the affected ranges AND file upload/posting permissions are enabled for any authenticated user.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.11.1511.4.511.5.3
Restrict or disable TIFF file uploads until a patch is applied. Implement file type restrictions and consider memory/CPU limits on file processing operations.
10.11.15, 11.4.5, 11.5.3, or 11.6.1 depending on your current major version branch
- 1. Identify the currently installed Mattermost Server version using the system console or CLI
- 2. Based on your current version, plan upgrade to the corresponding fixed release: 10.11.15, 11.4.5, 11.5.3, or 11.6.1
- 3. Back up your Mattermost database and configuration files before upgrading
- 4. Download the appropriate Mattermost Server fixed release from the official mattermost.com downloads page
- 5. Follow the standard Mattermost upgrade procedure for your deployment method (docker, omnibus, or manual)
- 6. After upgrade, verify the server starts successfully and test file upload functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5755 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5755 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data