Cross-site Scripting (XSS)Weakness · CWE-79

CVE-2026-57737

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-01
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable 7 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Averta LTD Shortcodes and extra features for Phlox theme allows DOM-Based XSS. This issue affects Shortcodes and extra features for Phlox theme: from n/a through 2.17.16.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

DOM-Based XSS vulnerability in the Shortcodes and extra features for Phlox theme allows attackers to inject malicious scripts through unsanitized user input that gets executed client-side in the browser. This occurs when the plugin processes and renders shortcode content without proper output encoding.

MitigationUpdate Shortcodes and extra features for Phlox theme to a version beyond 2.17.16 which should contain the patch. If no update is available, implement output encoding on all user-controlled data before rendering to the DOM and review shortcode handlers for proper sanitization.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Phlox shortcodes plugin is installed
    Check your WordPress installation for the 'Shortcodes and extra features for Phlox' theme/plugin. This is typically found in wp-content/plugins/auxin-shortcodes or similar. In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Shortcodes and extra features for Phlox' or 'Auxin Shortcodes'.
    Affected if The plugin is present in the installation
  2. Determine the installed plugin version
    In WordPress admin, navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins, find the Phlox shortcodes plugin, and read the version number from the plugin description. Alternatively, check the plugin's main PHP file header for the 'Version' tag.
    Affected if The version is 2.17.16 or earlier, or if no version is displayed and the plugin has not been updated recently
  3. Check active shortcodes that accept user input
    Review your WordPress pages, posts, and widget areas for shortcodes that process user-supplied content. Look for any custom or theme-specific shortcodes that might render content directly to the DOM without encoding. Search post content for shortcode syntax like [shortcode_name] and identify which ones handle user-controlled data.
    Affected if Shortcodes that render unsanitized user input to the page are actively in use
  4. Inspect rendered output for unsanitized content
    View the source of a page using the suspected shortcode in a browser. Look for any user-provided data appearing directly in HTML without being escaped (for example, look for <script> tags, event handlers like onclick=, or unencoded < > characters in user input fields).
    Affected if User input appears in the HTML output without proper encoding (such as &lt;script&gt; showing as literal text vs. encoded)

You are affected if the Shortcodes and extra features for Phlox plugin is installed with version 2.17.16 or earlier AND shortcodes that process user input are actively used on your site.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update Shortcodes and extra features for Phlox theme to a version beyond 2.17.16 which should contain the patch. If no update is available, implement output encoding on all user-controlled data before rendering to the DOM and review shortcode handlers for proper sanitization.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-57737 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-57737 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data