dbcve.org
Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2026-57781

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click 5 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Sovlix MeetingHub meetinghub allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects MeetingHub: from n/a through <= 1.25.10.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing authorization in Sovlix MeetingHub allows attackers to access resources or perform actions without proper authentication or authorization checks due to incorrectly configured access control security levels. The vulnerability has a CVSS 5.3 (Medium) rating, indicating network-exploitable with low complexity and no privileges required.

MitigationImplement proper authorization checks across all endpoints and enforce role-based access control (RBAC) to verify user permissions before granting access to sensitive resources or actions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Sovlix MeetingHub installation
    Search for Sovlix MeetingHub in your application inventory, installed software list, or web server directories. Check for files or services named 'Sovlix' or 'MeetingHub'.
    Affected if Sovlix MeetingHub is present in your environment
  2. Locate configuration files
    Examine the Sovlix MeetingHub installation directory for configuration files, particularly those controlling security settings, access control, or endpoint permissions. Common locations include config/, settings/, or conf/ directories.
    Affected if Access control or security configuration files exist and are in use
  3. Review endpoint access controls
    Inspect the application's API endpoints, web routes, or service URLs. Determine which endpoints handle sensitive operations or resource access. Check if authorization middleware or permission checks exist on these endpoints.
    Affected if Endpoints lack proper authorization checks or permit unauthenticated access to sensitive resources
  4. Test access control enforcement
    Attempt to access sensitive endpoints or perform privileged actions without providing valid authentication credentials or session tokens. Observe whether the application returns expected access denied responses or permits the request.
    Affected if The application allows access to protected resources without valid authentication or authorization credentials
  5. Check role-based access configuration
    Examine any role, permission, or user group configuration files or database tables. Verify if role definitions and permission mappings are properly defined and enforced across all application functions.
    Affected if Roles and permissions are not defined, improperly configured, or not enforced on certain endpoints

You are affected if Sovlix MeetingHub is installed and sensitive endpoints or actions can be accessed without proper authentication or authorization credentials.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authorization checks across all endpoints and enforce role-based access control (RBAC) to verify user permissions before granting access to sensitive resources or actions.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Version 1.25.11 or later

  1. 1. Backup the current MeetingHub installation and database before making any changes.
  2. 2. Check the Sovlix MeetingHub release notes or vendor documentation for version 1.25.11 or later releases.
  3. 3. Download the latest stable version of MeetingHub from the official vendor source.
  4. 4. Apply the upgrade following the vendor's standard upgrade procedure.
  5. 5. Verify that the access control configurations are properly set after upgrade.
  6. 6. Test that authorization controls are functioning correctly for all user roles.
  7. 7. Monitor for any security-related logs or alerts post-upgrade.
Caveat Review vendor release notes for any configuration changes or deprecations between 1.25.10 and the target version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-57781 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-57781 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data