CVE-2026-5789
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVulnerability related to an unquoted search path in CivetWeb v1.16. This vulnerability allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges by placing a malicious executable in a directory that is scanned before the intended application path (C:\Program Files\CivetWeb\CivetWeb.exe --), due to the absence of quotes in the service configuration.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn unquoted service path vulnerability in CivetWeb v1.16 allows local privilege escalation. The Windows service configuration for CivetWeb.exe at C:\Program Files\CivetWeb\ lacks quotation marks around the executable path, causing Windows to search for executables in intermediate directories (e.g., C:\Program) before the intended application, potentially allowing a local attacker to place a malicious binary that executes with elevated privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.16CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if CivetWeb is installed as a Windows serviceOpen Command Prompt as Administrator and run: sc queryex type= service state= all | findstr /i "civetweb"Affected if No CivetWeb service is found - not affected by this specific vulnerability
-
Retrieve the service executable pathRun: sc qc CivetWeb (or sc qc <service_name> if named differently)Affected if The service does not exist - not affected
-
Examine the BinPath for quotation marksRun: wmic service where "name='CivetWeb'" get pathname /format:list (or check the BINPATH displayed by sc qc)Affected if The displayed path contains spaces and is NOT wrapped in double quotes - AFFECTED
-
Identify intermediate directories in the unquoted pathIf the BinPath is unquoted (e.g., C:\Program Files\CivetWeb\CivetWeb.exe), note each directory: C:\Program, C:\Program Files\CivetWeb, etc.Affected if The path has intermediate directories that could be writable by a non-admin user - higher risk of exploitation
If CivetWeb runs as a Windows service AND the executable path in the service configuration contains spaces but lacks double quotes around it, the environment is affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedAdd double quotes around the executable path in the Windows service configuration (e.g., "C:\Program Files\CivetWeb\CivetWeb.exe") and ensure proper filesystem permissions to prevent unauthorized write access to parent directories.
Check vendor release notes for CivetWeb > 1.16 for any security updates addressing CWE-428
- 1. Identify the Windows service configuration for CivetWeb by checking the service properties (services.msc) or using: sc qc CivetWeb
- 2. Note the binary path value (BINARY_PATH_NAME) which should show: C:\Program Files\CivetWeb\CivetWeb.exe [arguments]
- 3. Modify the service to use quoted paths by running: sc config CivetWeb binPath= "C:\Program Files\CivetWeb\CivetWeb.exe [arguments]"
- 4. Alternatively, reinstall CivetWeb using an installer that properly quotes the service path, or upgrade to a version where the installer handles this correctly
- 5. Verify the fix by running: sc qc CivetWeb and confirming the path is now enclosed in double quotes
- 6. Restart the service to apply changes: net stop CivetWeb && net start CivetWeb
- 7. Review directory permissions on C:\Program Files\CivetWeb\ and all parent directories to ensure low-privileged users cannot write to locations that would be searched before the intended executable (e.g., C:\)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5789 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5789 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data