Cross-site Scripting (XSS)Weakness · CWE-79

CVE-2026-5793

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges 6 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Inrove Software and Internet Services BiEticaret allows Reflected XSS. This issue affects BiEticaret: before v3.3.57.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Reflected XSS vulnerability in BiEticaret allows attackers to inject malicious scripts through unsanitized user input that gets reflected in web page output. The vulnerability exists in versions before v3.3.57 of BiEticaret by Inrove Software and Internet Services.

MitigationUpgrade BiEticaret to v3.3.57 or later. If immediate upgrade is not possible, implement output encoding and input validation on all user-supplied parameters before reflecting them in HTML responses.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate BiEticaret installation and version file
    Find the BiEticaret web application directory (typically in /var/www/, /home/user/public_html/, or the web root). Look for a version.php, about.php, or config file that displays the application version.
    Affected if The installation exists but the version cannot be determined or shows a version number below v3.3.57
  2. Read installed version from application
    Open the version file or access the application admin panel /about page to extract the exact version number installed in your environment.
    Affected if The version displayed is before v3.3.57 (for example, v3.3.50, v3.2.1, etc.)
  3. Identify reflected input points
    Review the web application source code or test by submitting special characters (< > " ') as URL parameters or form inputs and checking if they appear unmodified in the HTML response.
    Affected if User-supplied parameters are reflected in HTML output without sanitization or encoding
  4. Compare version to CVE threshold
    Confirm whether your installed version falls below v3.3.57. If you cannot determine the exact version, treat the environment as potentially affected.
    Affected if Installed version is below v3.3.57

You are affected if the installed BiEticaret version is before v3.3.57 and user input is reflected in web page responses without output encoding.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade BiEticaret to v3.3.57 or later. If immediate upgrade is not possible, implement output encoding and input validation on all user-supplied parameters before reflecting them in HTML responses.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

BiEticaret v3.3.57 or later

  1. 1. Identify the current version of BiEticaret installed in your environment
  2. 2. Back up your current BiEticaret installation and database before proceeding with the upgrade
  3. 3. Obtain BiEticaret version 3.3.57 or later from the vendor (Inrove Software and Internet Services)
  4. 4. Follow the vendor's documented upgrade procedure to install version 3.3.57
  5. 5. Verify the upgrade was successful and test that the application functions correctly
  6. 6. Validate that the XSS vulnerability is remediated by attempting to inject test payloads in input fields

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing5.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $2,970
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5793 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5793 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data