CVE-2026-5824
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security vulnerability has been detected in code-projects Simple Laundry System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /userchecklogin.php. Such manipulation of the argument userid leads to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in code-projects Simple Laundry System 1.0 allows remote attackers to manipulate SQL queries via the userid parameter in /userchecklogin.php, potentially enabling unauthorized access or data exfiltration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Simple Laundry System installationSearch the server filesystem for directories containing 'laundry' or 'simple laundry' and check for the presence of userchecklogin.phpAffected if The application directory is found and contains userchecklogin.php in the web root or a subdirectory
-
Verify the vulnerable file existsConfirm that /userchecklogin.php (or the equivalent path within the laundry system directory) exists on the web serverAffected if The file exists at the expected path within the Simple Laundry System installation directory
-
Examine the userid parameter handlingOpen userchecklogin.php and search for the userid parameter usage in SQL queries - look for direct insertion of $_POST['userid'] or $_GET['userid'] into SQL strings without escaping or prepared statementsAffected if The code contains SQL queries that use the userid parameter directly without mysqli_real_escape_string, htmlspecialchars, or parameterized queries (bind_param/prepare)
-
Check database interaction layerReview the database connection code in userchecklogin.php to see if it uses mysqli or PDO with prepared statements versus legacy mysql_* functions or string concatenationAffected if The code constructs SQL queries through string concatenation with user input rather than using bound parameters
If Simple Laundry System 1.0 is installed and userchecklogin.php contains SQL queries that directly incorporate the userid parameter without sanitization or prepared statements, the environment is affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace direct string concatenation of the userid parameter with parameterized queries (prepared statements) in the PHP code, implement strict input validation, and apply principle of least privilege to database accounts.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5824 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5824 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data