Enterprise LinuxOperating system · Redhat

CVE-2026-58384

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-07
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
Public exploit No privileges 7 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A flaw was found in GIMP's PSD parser. An integer overflow in read_RLE_channel() can cause an undersized heap allocation for the RLE row-length table, after which subsequent per-row writes corrupt heap memory. This could lead to memory corruption, potentially resulting in denial of service or arbitrary code execution.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

GIMP's PSD parser contains an integer overflow vulnerability in the read_RLE_channel() function. When parsing RLE-compressed Photoshop files, the function calculates an undersized heap buffer for the row-length table due to integer overflow, leading to heap corruption when subsequent per-row writes occur.

MitigationUpdate GIMP to the patched version. Avoid opening untrusted PSD files with vulnerable GIMP versions until patched.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Enterprise LinuxOperating system
Affected:= 9.0
GimpApplication
Affected:= 3.2.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify GIMP is installed
    Run 'rpm -qa | grep -i gimp' on RHEL/CentOS or 'dpkg -l | grep -i gimp' on Debian-based systems, or check for gimp in your package manager
    Affected if GIMP is installed and matches version 3.2.4 on RHEL 9.0 or falls within the affected version range
  2. Confirm GIMP version number
    Run 'gimp --version' or check the package version via your system's package manager (rpm -q gimp or dpkg -s gimp)
    Affected if The installed version equals 3.2.4 on RHEL 9.0 or is an unpatched version that contains the vulnerable PSD parser code
  3. Identify if PSD files are processed
    Check recent file open operations or examine file association configurations for .psd files associated with GIMP. Look for PSD files in recent directories or check 'gimp -h' for file-related usage patterns
    Affected if Users routinely open or process RLE-compressed .psd (Photoshop) files using the vulnerable GIMP installation
  4. Verify the PSD plugin/module is available
    Check for the presence of the PSD file handling module in the GIMP plugin directory (typically /usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/ or similar path) or run 'gimp --new-instance' and attempt to open a PSD file
    Affected if The PSD file format plugin exists and is loadable, enabling the vulnerable read_RLE_channel() code path

You are affected if GIMP version 3.2.4 on RHEL 9.0 (or an unpatched version within the affected range) is installed and configured to handle RLE-compressed PSD files, as the integer overflow in read_RLE_channel() will trigger during PSD parsing.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update GIMP to the patched version. Avoid opening untrusted PSD files with vulnerable GIMP versions until patched.

Fix this in Enterprise Linux Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing5.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,610
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-58384 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-58384 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data