CVE-2026-5843
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe MLX inference backend in Docker Model Runner on macOS uses the MLX-LM library, which unconditionally imports and executes arbitrary Python files from model directories via the model_file configuration field in config.json. When a model's config.json specifies a model_file pointing to a Python file, MLX-LM uses importlib to load and execute it with no trust_remote_code gate or equivalent safety check. The MLX backend runs without sandboxing, resulting in arbitrary code execution on the Docker host as the Docker Desktop user. Any container on the Docker network can trigger this by calling the model-runner.docker.internal API to pull a malicious model from an attacker-controlled OCI registry and request inference.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDocker Model Runner's MLX inference backend on macOS unconditionally imports and executes arbitrary Python files from model directories via the model_file field in config.json using importlib, with no trust_remote_code gate or sandboxing. Any container on the Docker network can trigger arbitrary code execution on the Docker host by pulling a malicious model from an attacker-controlled OCI registry and requesting inference.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.56.0, < 4.71.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Docker Desktop versionOpen Docker Desktop and navigate to About, or run 'docker version' in the terminal. Confirm the version falls within the range >= 4.56.0 and < 4.71.0Affected if Docker Desktop version is between 4.56.0 and 4.70.x inclusive
-
Verify Docker Model Runner is installed and activeCheck if Docker Model Runner is available by running 'docker model list' or checking for the docker-model-runner service/containerAffected if Docker Model Runner is installed and running
-
Identify if MLX backend is enabledExamine the Docker Model Runner configuration or the model being used. Look for MLX-specific backend configuration in model config files or runtime settingsAffected if MLX backend is the active or configured backend for model inference
-
Inspect model loading sourceReview the model configuration files (such as config.json within model directories) to identify the source OCI registry and the model_file field being usedAffected if Models are being loaded from OCI registries, particularly untrusted or third-party registries
-
Check for absence of trust_remote_code safeguardsExamine the model configuration or Docker Model Runner settings for any trust_remote_code parameter and confirm it is not set to false or not enforced for MLX backendAffected if trust_remote_code is not enforced or is missing for model loading from OCI registries
A user is affected if running Docker Desktop 4.56.0 through 4.70.x with Docker Model Runner using the MLX backend to load models from OCI registries without trust_remote_code verification enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.71.0
Implement trust_remote_code validation before model_file execution and add sandboxing to the MLX backend to prevent arbitrary code execution from untrusted model packages.
Docker Desktop 4.71.0 or later
- 1. Ensure Docker Desktop is not running by clicking the Docker Desktop icon in the menu bar and selecting 'Quit Docker Desktop'
- 2. Download Docker Desktop version 4.71.0 or later from the official Docker website (https://www.docker.com/products/docker-desktop/)
- 3. Install the downloaded Docker Desktop .dmg file by opening it and dragging the Docker icon to the Applications folder
- 4. Launch Docker Desktop and wait for it to start completely
- 5. Verify the installed version by clicking the Docker Desktop icon and selecting 'About Docker Desktop' - it should show version 4.71.0 or higher
- 6. After upgrading, Docker Model Runner will prompt for user confirmation before loading any model files from remote sources, mitigating the arbitrary code execution vulnerability
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,024.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5843 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5843 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data