CVE-2026-58535
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUse of uninitialized resource in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
In the news
Third-party coverage- Microsoft July 2026 Patch Tuesday fixes massive 570 flaws, 3 zero-days
- Microsoft CVE Summary - Bleeping Computer
Surfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an information disclosure vulnerability in Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) stemming from the use of an uninitialized resource. An unauthorized remote attacker can exploit this over a network to potentially reveal sensitive information from the affected Windows system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.9339< 10.0.17763.9020< 10.0.19044.7548< 10.0.19045.7548< 10.0.26100.8875< 10.0.26200.8875< 10.0.28000.2525all versions= r2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify RDP is enabledOpen PowerShell and run: Get-ItemProperty -Path 'HKLM:\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Terminal Server' -Name 'fDenyTSConnections' | Select-Object -ExpandProperty fDenyTSConnections. A value of 0 means RDP is enabled.Affected if The value returned is 0, indicating RDP is enabled on this system.
-
Check Windows 10 version 1607 build numberRun: winver or 'systeminfo | findstr /C:"Build"'. Compare the build number to 10.0.14393.9339.Affected if Running Windows 10 1607 with build number less than 14393.9339.
-
Check Windows 10 version 1809 build numberRun: winver or 'systeminfo | findstr /C:"Build"'. Compare the build number to 10.0.17763.9020.Affected if Running Windows 10 1809 with build number less than 17763.9020.
-
Check Windows 10 version 21h2/22h2 build numberRun: winver or 'systeminfo | findstr /C:"Build"'. Compare the build number to 10.0.19044.7548 or 10.0.19045.7548 depending on your specific version.Affected if Running Windows 10 21h2 with build less than 19044.7548, or Windows 10 22h2 with build less than 19045.7548.
-
Check Windows 11 version build numberRun: winver or 'systeminfo | findstr /C:"Build"'. Compare to affected versions: 24h2 requires 26100.8875, 25h2 requires 26200.8875, 26h1 requires 28000.2525.Affected if Running Windows 11 24h2 below 26100.8875, 25h2 below 26200.8875, or 26h1 below 28000.2525.
-
Check Windows Server 2012/R2 versionRun: winver or 'systeminfo | findstr /C:"OS"'. Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2 are listed as all versions affected.Affected if Running Windows Server 2012 or Windows Server 2012 R2, regardless of build number.
The system is affected if RDP is enabled AND the Windows version/build falls within any of the affected ranges listed, or if running Windows Server 2012/R2.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.933910.0.17763.902010.0.19044.7548
Apply the relevant Microsoft Windows security update to patch the uninitialized resource vulnerability in RDP. Prioritize externally-facing systems with RDP exposure.
Windows 10 1607: build 10.0.14393.9339 or later | Windows 10 1809: build 10.0.17763.9020 or later | Windows 10 21h2: build 10.0.19044.7548 or later | Windows 10 22h2: build 10.0.19045.7548 or later | Windows 11 24h2: build 10.0.26100.8875 or later | Windows 11 25h2: build 10.0.26200.8875 or later |
- 1. Open Windows Settings and navigate to Update & Security > Windows Update
- 2. Click 'Check for updates' to ensure you have the latest patches
- 3. Install any available security updates for this month
- 4. Alternatively, manually download and install the specific cumulative update for your Windows version from the Microsoft Update Catalog
- 5. For Windows Server 2012 R2, Microsoft has released a security update; obtain it from Windows Update or the Microsoft Update Catalog
- 6. After installation, restart the affected system
- 7. Verify the installed update by checking Windows Update history or running 'winver' to confirm the build number matches or exceeds the fixed version for your Windows release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-58535 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-58535 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data