CVE-2026-59224
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpen WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. Prior to 0.10.0, backend/open_webui/routers/terminals.py built the ws_terminal upstream URL from an unencoded session_id and appended user_id as a query parameter, allowing query injection to make the terminal backend resolve another user identity; the HTTP proxy path also forwarded X-User-Id as an integrity-unbound identity claim. This issue is fixed in version 0.10.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn backend/open_webui/routers/terminals.py, the session_id is not URL-encoded when constructing the WebSocket terminal upstream URL, and user_id is appended as a query parameter. This allows query injection to make the terminal backend resolve a different user identity. Additionally, the HTTP proxy path forwards the X-User-Id header as an integrity-unbound identity claim, enabling identity spoofing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 0.10.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Open WebUI versionCheck the installed version of Open WebUI by reviewing the version file, Docker image tag, or the running application. Common locations include: the 'version' file in the installation directory, the Docker container tag, or the UI footer which sometimes displays the version.Affected if The installed version is lower than 0.10.0 (e.g., 0.9.x, 0.8.x, etc.)
-
Locate the vulnerable terminal router fileSearch for the file backend/open_webui/routers/terminals.py in the Open WebUI installation directory. This file handles WebSocket terminal connections.Affected if The file exists and is present in versions below 0.10.0
-
Inspect session_id handling in terminals.pyOpen backend/open_webui/routers/terminals.py and examine how the session_id is used when constructing the WebSocket upstream URL. Look for code that appends session_id or user_id to a URL without using URL encoding or proper escaping.Affected if The code shows session_id or user_id being directly concatenated into a URL string without URL encoding (e.g., no use of urllib.parse.quote or equivalent)
-
Check for X-User-Id header forwarding in proxy configurationExamine the HTTP proxy configuration that handles terminal requests. Look for any proxy rules or middleware that forward the X-User-Id header from incoming requests to the backend without validation or binding to an authenticated session.Affected if The proxy configuration passes the X-User-Id header to the backend without cryptographic binding to the session identity
-
Determine if terminal feature is accessibleVerify whether the terminal functionality is enabled and accessible to users. This may involve checking if the /terminals endpoint is exposed, or if users have permissions to access terminal features within the web UI.Affected if Terminal functionality is enabled and accessible to non-admin users, and the version is below 0.10.0
You are affected if Open WebUI version is below 0.10.0 and the terminal feature is in use, with the vulnerable code handling session_id without proper URL encoding and forwarding the X-User-Id header unbound to session integrity.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped0.10.0
Upgrade to Open WebUI version 0.10.0 or later which properly URL-encodes the session_id and addresses the integrity-unbound X-User-Id identity claim in the proxy path.
Open WebUI version 0.10.0
- 1. Back up your current Open WebUI installation, including configuration files and any custom data.
- 2. Pull the latest version 0.10.0 of the Open WebUI container image, or update via your installation method (e.g., `docker pull open-webui/webui:latest` or appropriate version tag).
- 3. Stop the currently running Open WebUI instance.
- 4. Start the new container with the updated image.
- 5. Verify the application starts successfully and check logs for any errors.
- 6. Test terminal functionality to confirm the authentication fix is working properly.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-59224 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-59224 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data