CVE-2026-59243
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe FAB auth manager's Azure AD OAuth login defaulted `verify_signature=False` when decoding the ID token, so an attacker able to present a forged or unsigned (`alg:none`) ID token to the OAuth callback could bypass authentication and log in as an arbitrary user, including one holding the Admin role (CWE-347). Deployments running the FAB auth manager with the Azure AD OAuth login path under its default configuration are affected; the Authentik path already defaulted to `True`. This issue affects `apache-airflow-providers-fab` before 3.7.3. Users are advised to upgrade to `apache-airflow-providers-fab` 3.7.3, which defaults `verify_signature=True`.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe FAB auth manager's Azure AD OAuth login had a critical security misconfiguration where it defaulted verify_signature=False when decoding ID tokens. This allowed attackers to bypass authentication entirely by presenting forged or unsigned (alg:none) ID tokens to the OAuth callback, enabling privilege escalation to Admin or any other user account.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.7.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed FAB provider versionRun: pip show apache-airflow-providers-fab | grep Version, or check your requirements/pip lock fileAffected if Version is lower than 3.7.3 (e.g., 3.7.2, 3.7.1, etc.)
-
Confirm FAB auth manager is in useInspect your Airflow configuration (airflow.cfg) or environment variables for webserver auth_backend or check if FAB security manager is enabledAffected if Using FAB as the auth manager for Airflow webserver authentication
-
Verify Azure AD OAuth is configuredLook for Azure AD related configuration: check for 'oauth' provider in your config, look for Azure AD tenant/client ID settings, or inspect the security manager configuration for Azure AD or Microsoft Online OAuth settingsAffected if Azure AD OAuth is configured as the authentication provider for FAB
-
Inspect verify_signature settingCheck your security manager configuration file or Airflow config for the verify_signature parameter under Azure AD/OAuth settings. Look for verify_signature=False or verify_signature not set (using default)Affected if verify_signature is explicitly set to False, OR is not explicitly set (relying on default) in versions before 3.7.3
You are affected if you are using Apache Airflow Providers Fab version less than 3.7.3 with FAB auth manager and Azure AD OAuth, where verify_signature is either set to False or uses the pre-3.7.3 default (False), allowing acceptance of unsigned or forged tokens.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.7.3
Upgrade apache-airflow-providers-fab to version 3.7.3 or later immediately, as this version sets verify_signature=True by default. Prior to upgrade, confirm no other authentication bypasses exist and review Azure AD OAuth configuration.
apache-airflow-providers-fab 3.7.3
- Upgrade the `apache-airflow-providers-fab` package to version 3.7.3 or later using your package manager (e.g., `pip install apache-airflow-providers-fab>=3.7.3`)
- After upgrading, verify that the Azure AD OAuth login path is working correctly with signature verification enabled by default
- If you previously set `verify_signature=False` explicitly in your configuration, review and update your configuration to use the new secure default or remove the explicit override
- Restart the Airflow webserver and scheduler services to apply the updated package
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-59243 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-59243 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data