CVE-2026-59253
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedn8n before 2.28.0 contains an improper authorization vulnerability allowing authenticated users to assign workflows to folders in other projects. Attackers can bypass project and folder authorization boundaries by supplying crafted request payloads during workflow creation, causing logical integrity violations in target project folder structures.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencen8n before version 2.28.0 has an improper authorization vulnerability in the workflow creation endpoint. Authenticated users can bypass project and folder authorization boundaries by supplying crafted request payloads that assign workflows to folders in other projects they don't have access to, causing logical integrity violations in target project folder structures.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.28.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed n8n versionCheck the n8n version by visiting /rest/version endpoint or running `docker images` if containerized, or checking package.json in the installation directoryAffected if Version is below 2.28.0 (e.g., 2.27.x, 2.26.x, etc.)
-
Verify multi-project feature is activeLog into n8n as an authenticated user and navigate to the Projects section in the UI, or query the /rest/projects API endpoint to list accessible projectsAffected if More than one project exists in the system and users have access to some but not all projects
-
Inspect workflow creation API behaviorUse a low-privileged authenticated account to examine the POST /rest/workflows request payload schema - look for fields that accept folder_id or project_id parametersAffected if The workflow creation endpoint accepts a folder_id or project_id parameter that can be modified by the client
-
Check for cross-project workflow assignments in audit logsQuery n8n audit logs (if enabled) for workflow creation events where the assigned folder belongs to a different project than the user's current project contextAffected if Audit logs show workflows created with folder assignments outside the user's authorized project scope
You are affected if your n8n installation version is below 2.28.0 and you have multiple projects with folder-based access controls configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.28.0
Upgrade to n8n version 2.28.0 or later which implements proper authorization checks to validate that users can only assign workflows to folders within their authorized projects.
n8n version 2.28.0 or later
- Backup your n8n data and database before starting the upgrade
- Stop the n8n service to prevent data corruption during upgrade
- If using npm: run 'npm install -g n8n@latest' or 'npm install -g [email protected]' to install the fixed version
- If using Docker: update your image tag to 'n8nio/n8n:2.28.0' or 'latest' in your docker-compose.yml or container run command, then recreate the container
- If using a managed deployment, consult your provider's documentation for upgrading n8n
- Start n8n and verify the service runs without errors
- Log in and verify that the authorization controls are working - test that users cannot assign workflows to folders outside their project scope
- Review the n8n 2.28.0 release notes for any configuration or migration requirements
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-59253 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-59253 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data