CVE-2026-5963
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedEasyFlow .NET developed by Digiwin has a SQL Injection vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands to read, modify, and delete database contents.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceEasyFlow .NET by Digiwin contains an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability that allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands. Due to lack of input sanitization in database queries, attackers can read, modify, and delete any data in the connected database without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.6.0, <= 6.6.17= 6.1.0= 8.1.1= 8.1.2= 8.1.3= 8.1.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed EasyFlow .NET versionLocate the version information in the application. Check the About page, assembly metadata, web.config file, or installation directory for a version file. Compare your installed version against the affected ranges: 6.1.0, 6.6.0 through 6.6.17, 8.1.1, 8.1.2, 8.1.3, or 8.1.4.Affected if The installed version matches any of the listed affected versions.
-
Determine if the application is network-accessibleIdentify whether the EasyFlow .NET web interface is exposed to internal or external networks. Check firewall rules, IIS bindings, or reverse proxy configurations to confirm accessibility scope.Affected if The application is accessible over the network (internal or external) and the version is affected.
-
Review database query implementationsExamine the application's source code or decompiled binaries to locate database query execution points. Focus on areas where user input flows into SQL statements without visible use of parameterized queries or stored procedures.Affected if Dynamic SQL queries are found that incorporate user input without proper parameterization.
-
Identify exposed input fieldsMap all user-facing input fields in the EasyFlow .NET application, such as login forms, search boxes, and parameter-passing URLs. Document which endpoints accept user-supplied data.Affected if The application accepts user input through web request parameters that flow to database queries.
Your environment is affected if EasyFlow .NET is running an unpatched version within 6.1.0, 6.6.0-6.6.17, or 8.1.1-8.1.4 and the application is accessible over a network where attackers can submit malicious SQL payloads through input fields.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or stored procedures, implement strict input validation across all user-supplied fields, and consider deploying a WAF as a temporary compensating control while code fixes are implemented.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation20.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5963 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5963 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data