CVE-2026-5972
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been found in FoundationAgents MetaGPT up to 0.8.1. This issue affects the function Terminal.run_command in the library metagpt/tools/libs/terminal.py. The manipulation leads to os command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of the patch is d04ffc8dc67903e8b327f78ec121df5e190ffc7b. Applying a patch is the recommended action to fix this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA command injection vulnerability in the Terminal.run_command function in metagpt/tools/libs/terminal.py of MetaGPT up to version 0.8.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via manipulated input. The vulnerability is exploitable remotely and a public exploit exists.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 0.8.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed MetaGPT versionRun: pip show metagpt or import metagpt; print(metagpt.__version__)Affected if Version is 0.8.1 or lower, or version cannot be determined (indicating older install)
-
Locate vulnerable terminal.py fileFind metagpt/tools/libs/terminal.py in your Python environment site-packages or project directoryAffected if The file exists and contains the Terminal.run_command function
-
Inspect run_command function for input handlingOpen metagpt/tools/libs/terminal.py and examine the run_command method for lack of input sanitizationAffected if The function accepts user input and passes it directly to shell execution (e.g., os.system, subprocess with shell=True) without sanitization
-
Determine if Terminal class is exposed to user inputReview how Terminal.run_command is called - check if web interfaces, APIs, or other input sources can invoke itAffected if The Terminal.run_command function is accessible via external input (HTTP API, user-provided scripts, or agent inputs)
You are affected if you have MetaGPT version 0.8.1 or lower AND the Terminal.run_command function is accessible with unsanitized user input reaching shell execution.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply patch d04ffc8dc67903e8b327f78ec121df5e190ffc7b to upgrade MetaGPT beyond version 0.8.1, or implement proper input validation and sanitization on all parameters passed to Terminal.run_command to prevent command injection.
- Review the vulnerable code in metagpt/tools/libs/terminal.py, specifically the Terminal.run_command function to identify the command injection point
- Apply the patch from commit d04ffc8dc67903e8b327f78ec121df5e190ffc7b to your local installation
- Verify the patch was applied correctly by reviewing the changes to the terminal.py file
- Test the fixed implementation to ensure the command injection vulnerability is resolved and legitimate functionality still works
- If using MetaGPT in production, consider upgrading to a newer version once available that incorporates this security fix
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5972 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5972 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data