CVE-2026-59732
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Prior to 1.74.4, rclone archive extract can write extracted files outside the user-selected destination prefix when extracting a crafted archive containing parent path components such as ../, allowing creation or overwrite of sibling objects in the same bucket or path scope. This issue is fixed in version 1.74.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceRclone versions prior to 1.74.4 contain a path traversal vulnerability in the archive extraction feature. When extracting archives, the software fails to properly validate that extracted file paths remain within the user-specified destination directory, allowing crafted archives containing parent path components (../) to write files outside the intended destination to sibling objects in the same bucket or path scope.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.74.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed rclone versionRun `rclone version` or `rclone --version` and note the version number shownAffected if The version displayed is less than 1.74.4 (for example, 1.74.3, 1.74.2, 1.73.0, etc.)
-
Identify archive extraction operationsReview rclone configuration files (typically in ~/.config/rclone/rclone.conf) and any scripts or automation that use rclone commands with archive extraction flags such as `--unzip`, `--untar`, `--unrar`, or the `serve archive` commandAffected if Archive extraction features (unzip, untar, unrar) are actively configured or used in rclone operations
-
Audit extraction destination pathsExamine the destination path specified in any archive extraction commands (the target directory argument after the archive source in commands like `rclone copyto` with archive flags)Affected if The destination path accepts user-controlled input or is used with archives from untrusted sources
-
Inspect archive sourcesReview the source of archives being extracted: check if they originate from untrusted users, external sources, or user-uploaded contentAffected if Archives being extracted come from sources that are not trusted or verified (e.g., user uploads, external URLs, shared buckets)
You are affected if rclone version is below 1.74.4 AND you use rclone to extract archives, particularly from untrusted or user-controlled sources, into destination paths that may then be accessed by other operations or users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.74.4
Upgrade rclone to version 1.74.4 or later. Until upgraded, avoid extracting untrusted archives and implement additional access controls on destination paths.
1.74.4
- Download Rclone version 1.74.4 from the official Rclone website (https://rclone.org/downloads/) or from the GitHub releases page
- Verify the downloaded file's checksum matches the published SHA256 hash for version 1.74.4
- Install or upgrade to Rclone 1.74.4 using your preferred installation method (direct binary, package manager, or source build)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-59732 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-59732 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data